KR> Re: KR2S Plans lacking detail

2011-08-16 Thread Tim Caughron
my modeling, but that is fine. Thanks again to all. -Original Message- From: Mark Langford [mailto:m...@n56ml.com] Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 4:20 AM To: KRnet Subject: Re: KR> Re: KR2S Plans lacking detail Tim Caughron wrote: >> Do I just guesstimate how wide the fuselage is

KR> Re: KR2S Plans lacking detail

2011-08-15 Thread Virgil N. Salisbury
; From: Mark Langford > To: KRnet > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 4:19 AM > Subject: Re: KR> Re: KR2S Plans lacking detail > > Tim Caughron wrote: > >>> Do I just guesstimate how wide the > fuselage is supposed to be at the tail section, or am I missing that >

KR> Re: KR2S Plans lacking detail

2011-08-15 Thread Charles Brown
You think those plans are lacking try the one's I bought in 1973 for the KR 1 four sheets and a green book telling you how to build it. From: Mark Langford To: KRnet Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 4:19 AM Subject: Re: KR> Re: KR2S Plans lacking det

KR> Re: KR2S Plans lacking detail

2011-08-15 Thread Mark Langford
Tim Caughron wrote: >> Do I just guesstimate how wide the fuselage is supposed to be at the tail section, or am I missing that critical measurement. Do I understand that the plans have no procedure for tri-gear, and that the details for those will be included in the install instructions of the gea

KR> Re: KR2S Plans lacking detail

2011-08-14 Thread Tim Caughron
>>Message: 11 >>Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:20:02 -0400 >>From: "Virgil N. Salisbury" >>Subject: Re: KR> Plans lacking details >>To: KRnet >>Message-ID: <4e482df2.90...@bellsouth.net> >>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> Build sides. Bend together and