Hi!
On Monday 09 July 2007 Jason Lucas wrote:
> In 0.3.6 it was possible to select the
> input/output of the PIC via a mouse click or drag. This is no longer
> working with the current svn version.
i fixed that... see my attached diff
bye then
julian
Index: src/picitem.h
On Saturday 14 July 2007 Julian Bäume wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Monday 09 July 2007 Jason Lucas wrote:
> > In 0.3.6 it was possible to select the
> > input/output of the PIC via a mouse click or drag. This is no longer
> > working with the current svn version.
> i fixed tha
On Saturday 01 September 2007 Lawrence Shafer wrote:
> We would be glad to have your help on the wiki! I basicaly layed out the
> wiki format and entered as much content as I could just to get things
> started, but I too am not so good with C++ so my contributions kinda
> stop there... The home pa
Hi there!
On Monday 10 September 2007 Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> The svn snapshot wasn't updated since a long long time. It's still with
> revision 18.
>
> Some of my contributions (passed though Jason) wasn't even included.
>
> So I'm asking, if anyone had some work that haven't pu
Hi again,
I just stumbled over some files that shouldn't be in svn. All these Makefiles
should be generated by configure, i guess... And some more files aren't
needed.
So this should be cleaned up.
bye
julian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday 10 September 2007 Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> On Monday 10 September 2007 20:27:43 Julian Bäume wrote:
> > Just the patch i did submit some weeks ago... Don't know, what happened
> > to it.
>
> Can you send it again to this mailing list? sounds like Jason didn
On Thursday 15 November 2007 Alan Grimes wrote:
> Okay, I think I managed to post some updates to SVN. I only posted the
> ones I'm most confident in. There should be fewer warnings with this
> changeset than with the previous version when compiled with --Wall
> --Wpedantic
Hey, thanks so far! :)
On Friday 16 November 2007 Alan Grimes wrote:
> I tried to check in a bunch of changes -- removing the class Map. (
> changes don't work independantly...)
>
> When I did, It failed, svn barfs up hundreds of megabytes of error
> messages every time I run it, the relevant line seems to be:
>
> svn: F
Hi,
I wanted to compile latest trunk this morning and I got a problem with -r69.
Alan, you used "kdebug() << "Wire voltage error: " << temp << endl;" to get
some output. I understand why you do this, because I saw issues like that,
too. But anyway. It doesn't compile. I had to change the line to
Hi,
I just updated the Makefile.am files in trunk. It links fine for me now.
bye then
julian
On Sunday 25 November 2007 Nagy László wrote:
> Hi
>
> Latest svn (vector class cleanup done) many errors.
> In mandriva 2008 x86_64 system
>
> ../src/electronics/.libs/libelectronics.a(circuit.o): In
> f
Hey there,
since my lectures are finished now, I decided to take some time and do some
work on ktechlab. It's been quite a long time without any activity on the
list.
Since the last stuff I worked on, what the autotools system, I decided to have
a closer look and do a step forward to get closer
I'm still getting the same backtrace :( I think I use some compile options
that make my backtraces unusable until some point (as you can see in my last
mail, I get a complete stack within ktechlabs environment). I'm sure I'll
find something on techbase.kde.org or on gentoo-wiki.com, but I can't
Hi,
I just commited the cmake version into branches/ktechlab-0.3.6cmake. If anyone
is interested in testing, check it out. Find some initial information on how
to use it in the INSTALL file and expect me to set up a page in the wiki in
the next days.
bye then
julian
signature.asc
Description
Hi,
On Monday 25 February 2008 20:05:09 Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Julian Bäume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just commited the cmake version into branches/ktechlab-0.3.6cmake. If
> > anyone is interested in testing, chec
Hi,
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 10:04:44 Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> ktechlab can't be built under gcc4.3
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=470274&name=build.log
this is an issue, that showed up before and is fixed in svn. (Both, trunk and
0.3.6 tag). I attached a diff, you may wa
On Saturday 17 May 2008 Jason Lucas wrote:
> Guys,
>
> With regret I have to announce the shutdown of the Ktechlab project.
I', very sad, to hear that :-/
> I now have other career prospects to follow which preclude the funding of
> this project.
Well, ok. I can understand that, since it's bee
Hey!
I'm glad to hear that there are quite some users out there, that are willing
to help to make ktechlab better and translate it to their mother tongue. If
you would like to have your language in the svn repo, just send your work to
me, I'll put it into svn. That's just in the case you have do
Hi there,
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 Lawrence Shafer wrote:
> As I said a long time ago on here, last time this was abandoned, I would
> be more than willing to host the site on my servers for free for as long as
> I'm in business. I run orbwireless.net so it don't see why it shouldn't
> last 10 ye
Hi,
it's me again,
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 Jason Lucas wrote:
> Well, thanks for the input Guys. It's the busiest time the list has seen
> for a while! One thing that is most apparent is that we would all like
> to keen the project alive, but none of us have the time to do it. I'm
> surprised tha
Hi,
as Jason mentioned, he will leave the position as the project maintainer soon.
So we are looking for a successor. I would have offered to do the job, but
somehow I'm afraid, that I've got too little experience in maintaining a
project.
I think working on a project in the spare time has to b
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 Gopala Krishna wrote:
> May be we(or even me) should have tried to apply for gsoc-08 for
> ktechlab porting to kde4. I hope the project will be alive amongst you
> great contributors. I don't know when i'll get time to contribute :-(
Yeah, I thought about that, but during t
Hi,
I'm attending aKademy 2008 at the moment in Belgium. The hacking-marathon is
running since yesterday, and since yesterday I started to port the KTechlab
GUI to the KDE4 framework. For now I only set up a local mercurial repository,
but I will upload my results at least at the end of the week
Hey,
I applied your patch to my trunk on Sunday and tested it.
On Friday 18 July 2008 18:35:32 P Zoltan wrote:
> Any comments are welcome :)
I think you did a nice job. The structure makes more sense for me now.
For me everything still works fine... and I couldn't find any problems while
readi
Hi,
On Tuesday 26 August 2008 12:11:50 P Zoltan wrote:
> I think in long term it's good for the project. However, I see a few
> problems which should be resolved in order to make ktechlab successful.
>
> Being part of the kdeedu means more users for ktechlab. These users will
> want to report bug
Hi,
On Tuesday 12 August 2008 13:17:09 Michael T. wrote:
> I follow ktechlab more closely then even qucs just
> because of the cool visual simulation. An extremely useful learning aid for
> linux which I actually paid $3xx something on windows.
I expect even better visualisation with the possibili
On Sunday 31 August 2008 15:23:38 P Zoltan wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:55:43 +0200, Alan Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> >> I'm waiting for feedback :D
> >
> > keep up the good work. This type of work will be critical to pushing
> > Ktechlab forward in the future.
> >
> > Also, see abo
Hi!
On Monday 01 September 2008 13:25:47 00Piano wrote:
> hello there,
> i tried to get ktechlab working on my mac with osx installed (kde, xcode
> tools, qt as well). unfortunatelly, with no success.
After reading your mail a second time, I see a problem here. ktechlab doesn't
only rely on Qt3 b
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 23:50:28 P Zoltan wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I've uploaded draft of the documentation I want to write here:
> http://zotanp.extra.hu/architecture-doc-00.odt
> In this stage it's very incomplete, I will write more as I have time.
Hey, that's a nice work, I'm going to ke
On Thursday 11 September 2008 22:18:47 P Zoltan wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:30:04 +0200, Julian Bäume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could you put the umbrello XML files into the svn? We can create a
> > documentation directory in trunk to store such files. I think it&#x
Hi,
I just recompiled the trunk version (with running make clean before).
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 08:25:56 Alan Grimes wrote:
> This is from a fresh build that is in almost perfect sync with the SVN
> archive.
>
> Some mega bugs seem to have gotten in.
>
> Somehow the main editor has gotten s
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 13:53:42 P Zoltan wrote:
> I've just committed the removal of Node::type() member in the svn. (the
> program still works for me) The negative part of this change is that now
> instead of someNode->type() now there are checks like
> "dynamic_cast(someNode) != 0". I've
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 18:08:41 Michael T. wrote:
> > P Zoltan said:
> >
> > I think a mirror for the wiki from ktechlab.org would be really needed,
> > as that site will go offline in a week.
>
>- Who has perfect copy of what so far is part of ktechlab? I think it
>would be
Hey,
On Thursday 18 September 2008 16:03:30 P Zoltan wrote:
> I've just found this: http://www.wiki.sourceforge.net/
cool, I think Jason didn't enable it, because KTechLab maintains it's own
private website.
> So theoretically any SF.net project can have a wiki. I think it's a good
> idea to
d David do to Qcanvas and can it be ported back
> > into the standard tree so that we're not maintaining a ton of
> > trolltech's code along with our own?
> >
> > Someone mentioned that he was working on a QT4 port, how is that going?
>
> Julian Bäu
Hey,
I'm glad, you're still willing to take over the web part.
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 15:23:58 Lawrence Shafer wrote:
> I'm standing by, ready to take over the web end here at the drop of a pin.
> I'm the one that got the current wiki started, and am also an admin there.
> August is long ov
Hey Glen,
nice to hear, that you're interested in helping out on KTechLab.
On Thursday 06 November 2008 16:26:05 Glen wrote:
> This looks like... it has a TON of promise. I love the real-time
> oscilloscope and the simple way of dragging a component and hooking it up.
Yes, I also like the UI very
On Thursday 06 November 2008 17:52:26 Glen wrote:
> >> So the question is, what should I do and where should I start?
> >
> > Well, you said you want new compontents to be implemented ;) Why not
> > start working on the simulator? I really think this one needs some love,
> > too. Zoltan and Alan di
On Thursday 06 November 2008 19:03:16 Mariano MARINI wrote:
> The wiki say that there's an italian translation. How can I get it?
It ships with the source-code. (At least there is a it.po file in the svn
trunk). So you should just tell KDE to use Italian as the main language. (Is
there a "Switch
On Friday 07 November 2008 01:14:35 Glen wrote:
> Is there any direction / ideas for what direction the simulator should
> go? I have my own ideas, especially now since I've probed the code a
> little bit, but what's really better for the project?
Some time ago, it was mentioned on the list, that t
On Saturday 08 November 2008 12:06:03 Celelibi wrote:
> 2008/11/8, P Zoltan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:09:13 +0100, Julian Bäume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> >> On Friday 07 November 2008 01:14:35 Glen wrote:
> >>> Is th
On Saturday 08 November 2008 19:17:11 Glen wrote:
> >> I'm not against the use of XML, but I think that only simple components
> >> should be written in XML. Others may be written in C/C++, compiled as
> >> .so and loaded at launch time (or later...).
> >
> > I fully agree with your last point here
On Saturday 08 November 2008 20:28:00 Glen wrote:
> First things first, I think.
>
> We need a dev roadmap before we can start arguing file formats.
>
> 1. What do we want it to *do*?
>
> 2. How do we make it do what we want, and how can we leverage what we
> already have to make it do it sooner?
>
On Saturday 08 November 2008 23:31:04 Glen wrote:
> I'm upgrading to ubuntu 8.10 as I write this to make dealing with the
> KDE stuff better and to fix a few things I've torn apart. I had KDE 4.0,
> not 4.1 Classic wasn't available in 4.0 and that's a large part
> wasn't enjoying the experience.
J
On Monday 10 November 2008 20:43:21 Glen wrote:
> Agreed.
Me too.
> I have no idea who should be elected to head it up. Julian has admin,
> doesn't he? I'm still unsure of who has what. Should there be an election?
I'm sorry, I also don't have any admin rights :-S. I just got (as Zoltan does)
svn
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 00:06:29 P Zoltan wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:59:32 +0100, Alan Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > here's the biggest bug I'm seeing on my machine...
> > I have this simulation of my father's Harman Kardon 430 (from 1974)...
> > The amp works (even though it
Hey,
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 22:38:36 P Zoltan wrote:
>As a code cleanup I'm plannig to separate electronics and flowparts,
> such that electornic nodes to be connected with electronic connectors,
> while flownodes to be connected with flowconnectors. Obviously buth
> connector types and
Hi,
sorry, that I step in here so late, I've been busy with some formal stuff for
my studies. I got some paper ready with some work I want to do the next 3
month on KTechLab. Details will follow later. (On monday I will meet somebody
and explain my work, and then we decide, if I can work for the
Hi,
another thing I got is concerning packaging in the future.
I got an account on novells buildservice and I think I will play around with
it, when the KDE4 branch gets a bit more in shape, which could happen soon. I
got 2 more things on my list, before I'll push everything I did so far into an
hi,
in another mail I mentioned some work I want to do in the next month. I got a
short description about it in german. I can't show it in detail for now, also
I want to do my work in an open process. I have to clarify if that is
possible, first. So I give some ideas here:
I thought about about
a good choice.
bye then
julian
> Julian Bäume wrote:
> > hi,
> > in another mail I mentioned some work I want to do in the next month. I
> > got a short description about it in german. I can't show it in detail for
> > now, also I want to do my work in an open process. I
Hi,
On Monday 26 January 2009 07:12:24 Alan Grimes wrote:
> Niels Egberts wrote:
> > First of all I have to say ktechlab is absolutely great and I think it
> > has very much potential. The way everything just appears at an instant
> > on your screen is amazing. Most things I've tried till now were
Hey,
I just installed kdelibs3 and checked that myself. It works fine here. Please
note that you need "external connections" to create subcircuits.
I mentioned a crash when dragging a subcirtuit over the CircuitDocument and
fixed that in trunk. git blame command told me, that Alan commented out
Hi,
Jason, I put you in CC, since I don't know, if you do check this mailing-list
regularly.
I wanted to update some things in the bug-tracker, but it seems I got no
rights to change anything. I just can add comments, as a normal user can do. I
guess, Jason, as the project-admin needs to activa
Hi,
I thought about that, too. I'm not aware of how stable the trunk is. Since
some distributions ran into stability issues, I suggest to do a release soon.
I just created a branch ktechlab-0.3.7 in svn to prepare the release. If you
do (bug-fix-)commits to the trunk, make sure to backport them
Hi,
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 16:06:17 Niels Egberts wrote:
> I would be willing to package the new version to Ubuntu. The one that is
> now in the repo is extremely unstable.
Thanks four your help. Do you have any experiences in creating .deb packages?
Can we help you in some way?
bye
julian
On Saturday 31 January 2009 00:54:14 P Zoltan wrote:
> My question is: how should we track the bugs? Just enumerating them here
> isn't really useful.
Since the SF project is of nearly no use for us ATM, I created a page in the
wiki to help us:
http://www.ktechlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=Devel:
moin,
After playing around with KTechLab and fixing some bugs, I finally found a way
to reproduce the corrupted-circuits problem.
Create a simple circuit (I needed at least 3 components to reproduce.), save
it. Delete a wire, add it again. Save it. Close the document, reopen. Find at
least one
hey,
I can exclude that this corruption happens during saving to file. I fiddled
around with gdb the whole night and found out, that
ItemDocumentData::m_connectorDataMap (typedef QMap< QString, ConnectorData >
ConnectorDataMap;) contains less entries than it should have.
Tomorrow I'll try to fi
hi,
I mentioned, that I don't get any debug-output on the command line. Does
anybody have a clue, why this happens? gdb is nice, but in some situations
unhandy.
I compiled with:
./configure --enable-debug=full --prefix=/home/jb/usr/kde3
(Debug symbols are all compiled in, else I wouldn't get us
Hey,
On Sunday 01 February 2009 16:01:14 P Zoltan wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:33:20 +0100, Julian Bäume wrote:
> > hi,
> > I mentioned, that I don't get any debug-output on the command line. Does
> > anybody have a clue, why this happens? gdb is nice, but in some
On Sunday 01 February 2009 06:20:46 Julian Bäume wrote:
> Tomorrow I'll try to find, where and why there is data removed from that
> list. The key of that QMap is a QString that represents the id of the
> connector, so if there are 2 connectors with the same id added to this
> Q
Hi,
first, please excuse this quite late answer, since we have been busy preparing
a new release of KTechLab.
Thank you for your help in translating KTechLab.
On Monday 26 January 2009 20:34:36 Ezequiel Cabrillo García wrote:
> My name is Ezequiel Cabrillo (ezequiel.cabri...@educa.madrid.org) an
Hey,
On Monday 02 February 2009 11:53:09 Michael T. wrote:
> After thought I decided to pull the plug i'm going to refocus my site.
> Either on Electronics resources or another app. Since the main site is
> going to have an overhaul in coming weeks no dupe work.
Right, no need to do duplicate
hey,
I think, I got it. Please test it, for me, it seems to work. I couldn't
reproduce it any longer. What I actually did was to make sure, all ids in a
ItemDocument are unique. At least for the Connectors this should now be the
case. I'll have a look into other components later.
Please drop me
On Sunday 08 February 2009 00:19:12 P Zoltan wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:42:24 +0100, Alan Grimes
>
> wrote:
> > I declare the current SVN version to be a release candidate for version
> > 0.4.
>
> I don't that version number is aproprate. Version 0.3.7 would be more
> appropriate for it, be
hey everyone,
I want to give a brief status of my work on the KDE4 port. This also comments
on some parts of the "Porting to Qt4 -> I'd like to help"-thread.
I tried to convert the sources, using the qt3to4 tool, but I didn't like the
result very much. So I decided to experiment with some new KD
Hi,
I fixed the last issue on the list and mentioned another one during my tests.
Can anybody confirm it? If not, it's my fault and MainWindow just reads a
wrong ktechlabui.rc file, because of some wrong directed path-variables.
During all my debugging I didn't mention any crashes (that weren't
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 20:23:51 Juan De Vincenzo wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Well, after a lot of reading I finally found the time to sit in front
> of the machine and I was able to complete part of the porting. Overall
> the process took around one hour and a half.
The build-system (you started po
On Sunday 08 February 2009 21:40:00 Alan Grimes wrote:
> Juan De Vincenzo wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I'm really keen for your feedback. =)
>
> Yes, I'm in favor of a more direct port of Ktechlab to 4.x.
I thought about that. But the more I read in the code, the more I saw the need
of some design changes
On Sunday 08 February 2009 22:39:05 Glen Canaday wrote:
> > I partly broke my gentoo, too, when upgrading from KDE4.1 to 4.2. It was
> > way more easy to install 4.x and remove old KDE3 packets. ;)
>
> I can't compile KDE3 apps, period. Installing the dev libs after I wiped
> clean and went to kubu
On Monday 09 February 2009 03:33:57 Jason Lucas wrote:
> I've not checked SVN for a while, but I believe Julian has that in hand.
Yepp, find it in branches/ktechlab-0.3.7.
> As for forums and bug tracking, these are both available on sourceforge
> - We just need people to manage them. Any offers?
On Monday 09 February 2009 16:35:48 P Zoltan wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:11:41 +0100, Julian Bäume wrote:
> >> The idea of integrating it with kdevelop to a greater extent is
> >> interesting and has a great deal of potential... (wonder if you could
> >> flowpar
On Monday 09 February 2009 18:07:13 Alan Grimes wrote:
> I just figured out how to grab the intended release branch. There are a
> number of important changes that I had intended for the branch that I
> had put in trunk.
I backported all bug-fixes into the branch. I saw you changed the declarations
On Tuesday 10 February 2009 01:14:32 Jason Lucas wrote:
> Julian, I've given you admin access to the bug tracker.
Thanks! I just played around with it and I really like it ;) I think this
could be very helpful in the future. It's way better to track open issues like
this and not with some dynamic
hi,
I just setup my openSUSE BuildService account and created a KTechLab sub-
project in my homedir on their servers. I took a .spec file from another
repository providing the 0.3.6 version of KTechLab, linked the dependencies
into my build dir and changed the .spec file to work.
I can now crea
moin,
I came up with a solution how to integrate the KDevPlatform library. ATM I
only rely on their interfaces and started to implement them myself. I also use
their UI implementations. CMake is able to figure out whether KDevPlatform is
installed (including -devel packages) or not. It than can
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 12:53:07 P Zoltan wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:39:21 +0100, Julian Bäume wrote:
> > moin,
> > I came up with a solution how to integrate the KDevPlatform library. ATM
> > I
> > only rely on their interfaces and started to implement
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 12:01:16 Jose Luis Galvez Lopez wrote:
> I am working with the help-file and I've seen is that selecting the D /
> A converter in Context help not see the text in Spanish.
> What is the problem? My work can be downloaded from
> http://www.box.net/shared/tsarcqs6qj
Did
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 22:20:31 P Zoltan wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:02:38 +0100, Juan De Vincenzo
>
> wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I've been thinking that maybe, a good way to obtain some extra hands
> > for the project would be with an open call for developers which could
> > be carri
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 20:00:42 Juan De Vincenzo wrote:
> I'd like to also say that I'm as well in favor of a redesign or
> rewrite of the code wherever it is necessary, and the reason why I
> didn't started such a task myself is because, how I stated on my first
> e-mail, I'm only in the fi
On Thursday 12 February 2009 09:49:07 Jose Luis Galvez Lopez wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 February 2009 12:01:16 Jose Luis Galvez Lopez wrote:
> > I am working with the help-file and I've seen is that selecting the D /
> > A converter in Context help not see the text in Spanish.
> > What is the problem
On Thursday 12 February 2009 11:38:33 Jose Luis Galvez Lopez wrote:
> Yes, /usr/share/apps/ktechlab/contexthelp/help-es is the directory, but
> the text in spanish of the D/A converter device not shown :(
Thanks, I will have a look at that.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed m
On Thursday 12 February 2009 11:47:21 Julian Bäume wrote:
> On Thursday 12 February 2009 11:38:33 Jose Luis Galvez Lopez wrote:
> > Yes, /usr/share/apps/ktechlab/contexthelp/help-es is the directory, but
> > the text in spanish of the D/A converter device not shown :(
>
>
On Thursday 12 February 2009 16:07:23 Lawrence Shafer wrote:
> David finally transfered the domain name! The only problem now is that
> the namservers are set to everydns.net, and that is what I was planning
> on using. So before I go create my dns records, we need to find out who
> has the ktechl
On Friday 13 February 2009 16:38:26 P Zoltan wrote:
> It seems to me that the bug is caused by not hiding the connectors from
> the internal structure of the subcircuit (I guess ktechlab is just dumping
> the contents of the subcircuit on the actual circuit, but makes is hidden).
Thanks for your
On Friday 13 February 2009 19:43:40 P Zoltan wrote:
> Some more results: it doesn't work as I thought. The simulator "needs"
> those connectors for the simulation, but they somehow get "out" of the
> subcircuit. Another note: if in the Connector constructor no new ids are
> generated, just
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 19:48:21 P Zoltan wrote:
> More news: the root of this issue is ItemDocument, which seems to
> register UIDs, and fails to unregister them -- even if there is no item
> associated to that UID. I've comitted in the 0.3.7 branch a fix which
> unregisters the UID of the c
Hi,
I put your files into svn (trunk) it won't come with the next release, but we
will do another KDE3 release soon and it will be in there.
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 19:24:50 you wrote:
>Hi Julian.
>
> The translation is almost complete but never mind, work is OK. Just
> missing sentence
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 03:45:56 Alan Grimes wrote:
> Take my advice, don't get started on profiling and optimization unless
> you have several days worth of time to waste. =P
>
> The biggest CPU sucker in ktechlab is the linear algebra engine. The
> reason it gets called so much is that non-
hi,
just to have it in a separate thread:
Some questions from me: where/how should we do the meeting? jabber-group-chat?
irc?
I setup a wiki page to plan this event:
http://www.ktechlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=Devel:Meeting-0902
Discussion can be done on the mailing-list.
bye
julian
PS: look
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 13:26:15 Richard Rondu wrote:
> I vote IRC ( channel #ktechlab-devel ) ?
>
> By the way, sorry for the off-topic, but I think this could be a good
> idea to have an IRC channel for support / development ( #ktechlab &
> #ktechlab-devel? or just one of those?)
Well, besi
Hi,
On Thursday 19 February 2009 10:13:30 Juan De Vincenzo wrote:
> As I discussed with Julian and Alan over IRC yesterday, I'll be
> working on a modification that I can actually do, which is updating
> the names in the about section, that's why I would like to request the
> complete list of name
Hi,
while being busy working on the kde4 port, I somehow forgot about the 0.3.7
release. To push this forward I just commit some changes to the about-box. I
didn't put any e-mail data into it, because I wasn't sure which addresses to
use and if I am allowed to publish it. I also hope, I got all
Hi,
as I mentioned before, I've been working on moving KTechLab to use
kdevplatform as a base to provide some general features like project
management, plugin handling, document handling, unified look&feel, some
language support, debuggers,...
Some days ago, I read a mail on the kdevelop-devel
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 10:56:38 P Zoltan wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:14:18 +0100, Julian Bäume wrote:
> > Hi,
> > while being busy working on the kde4 port,
> Where do we do the brainstorming? I have a few ideas, but don't know
> (yet) where to write them down.
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 21:53:38 Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:41 PM, P Zoltan wrote:
> > The code that will be released is located in branches/ktechlab-0.3.7/ ,
> > momentanly having rev.235. Please check if that tree has this issue.
>
> Hello,
> it suffers the same build
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 23:31:11 Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Julian Bäume wrote:
> > I think, this is a missing header file. Could you try r238 from the
> > ktechlab-0.3.7 branch?
>
> This r238 went further. But however ktechlab sources are
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 23:56:30 Glen Canaday wrote:
> I'm a little lost. Where is Julian's KDE4 port base?
This is far from being finished... and not in svn, yet. I setup a wiki page,
where I put some information about how to get the sources and play around with
it. Don't expect anything usef
Hey,
On Sunday 22 March 2009 22:05:27 Glen wrote:
> I can finally compile cool stuff as things are essentially the way
> they're supposed to be. I can compile KDE4 and QT3/4 stuff. No KDE3
> since the ubuntu repositories + pgp keys are a pain to mess with.
> (repositories, easy, key files, I can ne
Hey,
On Sunday 19 April 2009 20:33:02 Vincent Nikkelen wrote:
> Btw, SVN compiles fine on OpenSuSE 11.1, 64bit. (Btw, some older posts talk
> about verison 0.3.7, SVN announces itself as 0.4.0.)
There is a 0.3.7 branch in svn. We haven't managed to release it, yet. IMHO it
should be ready for the
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
