On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:17:24 +0100, Lawrence Shafer
wrote:
>
> I just Checked out revision 204, and still have the same problem, just
> not as
> bad. Am I getting it from the wrong place?
Try (any) branch after rev. 208.
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 19:48:21 P Zoltan wrote:
> More news: the root of this issue is ItemDocument, which seems to
> register UIDs, and fails to unregister them -- even if there is no item
> associated to that UID. I've comitted in the 0.3.7 branch a fix which
> unregisters the UID of the c
P Zoltan wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:48:55 +0100, Alan Grimes
wrote:
I seem to have a problem with my build or something, I haven't had
pop-up menus in a dog's age and don't see any subcircuit feature
anywhere.
When you right-click on a circuit, you should see
P Zoltan wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:48:55 +0100, Alan Grimes
>> I seem to have a problem with my build or something, I haven't had
>> pop-up menus in a dog's age and don't see any subcircuit feature
>> anywhere.
> When you right-click on a circuit, you should see a menu. The last entr
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:48:55 +0100, Alan Grimes
wrote:
>
> I seem to have a problem with my build or something, I haven't had
> pop-up menus in a dog's age and don't see any subcircuit feature
> anywhere.
>
When you right-click on a circuit, you should see a menu. The last entry
should b
Add an "External Connection" to the circuit, Select all, then right
click for "create sub-circuit."
Bryan
Alan Grimes wrote:
>> Some general info: in the above mentioned method "this" is the subcircuit
>> to be merged and the parameter of the method represents the cicuit seen by
>> the us
> Some general info: in the above mentioned method "this" is the subcircuit
> to be merged and the parameter of the method represents the cicuit seen by
> the user.
I seem to have a problem with my build or something, I haven't had
pop-up menus in a dog's age and don't see any subcircuit fea
> PS: I'm looking for a solution to work-around this issue, because this is
> quite annoying, even if you don't mess up everything by changing your
> local
> sub-circuits.
Here are some findings after 2 hours of debugging:
In
void SubcircuitData::initECSubcircuit( ECSubcircuit * ecSubcir
On Friday 13 February 2009 19:43:40 P Zoltan wrote:
> Some more results: it doesn't work as I thought. The simulator "needs"
> those connectors for the simulation, but they somehow get "out" of the
> subcircuit. Another note: if in the Connector constructor no new ids are
> generated, just
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:53:37 +0100, Julian Bäume wrote:
> On Friday 13 February 2009 16:38:26 P Zoltan wrote:
>> It seems to me that the bug is caused by not hiding the connectors
>> from
>> the internal structure of the subcircuit (I guess ktechlab is just
>> dumping
>> the contents of the
On Friday 13 February 2009 16:38:26 P Zoltan wrote:
> It seems to me that the bug is caused by not hiding the connectors from
> the internal structure of the subcircuit (I guess ktechlab is just dumping
> the contents of the subcircuit on the actual circuit, but makes is hidden).
Thanks for your
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:03:29 +0100, Lawrence Shafer
wrote:
> I was just playing with a couple of sub-circuits, and noticed that when
> a sub-circuit is added to the sheet, a whole bunch (a real mess) of
> wires get added too. I also cant get my subcircuit to behave properly
> after deleting th
I was just playing with a couple of sub-circuits, and noticed that when
a sub-circuit is added to the sheet, a whole bunch (a real mess) of
wires get added too. I also cant get my subcircuit to behave properly
after deleting the wires. This is with the SVN version from yesterday.
2009-02-10
I'm n
13 matches
Mail list logo
