I reopened the file I was working on, and the circuit that I could not get
to work works perfect now. Still with rev 353. When I notice it again I can
post screenshots, but I dont know very well how to run traces and stuff.
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
> Niels Egberts wrot
Niels Egberts wrote:
> Just a few days ago I fiddled with the thought to create a CPU within
> ktechlab. But after a few minutes of fiddling I noticed an AND-port that
> had 2 high-imputs but still had a low-output :(.
I've been taking a crowbar to those over the past few weeks. There
really shoul
Probably it's memory corruption. The current SVN version needs some fixes
regarding this, because running ktechlab under valgrind reveals quite a
few problems.
This topic has given me an idea: it would be very cool to create a finite
state machine component, which could be described usi
Just a few days ago I fiddled with the thought to create a CPU within
ktechlab. But after a few minutes of fiddling I noticed an AND-port that had
2 high-imputs but still had a low-output :(.
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
> One key benchmark for the maturity of this projec
One key benchmark for the maturity of this project would be the ability
to simulate an entire CPU.
I fiddled around with that today and came to the following wishlist:
1. We need "tri-state" logic, (High, Low, and Z where Z is "High
impedance").
2. We need the option to be able to configure any
