TEST
* dev-qt/qtcore
Latest version available: 5.11.2-r1
Latest version installed: 5.11.2-r1
Size of files: 45,855 KiB
Homepage: https://www.qt.io/
Description: Cross-platform application development framework
License: || ( GPL-2 GPL-3 LGPL-3 ) FDL
On Monday 19 April 2010 13:04:06 P Zoltan wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:33:45 +0200, P Zoltan
>
> wrote:
> > Then getting the model is currently not possible. Not a big problem,
> >
> > can be fixed with the interfaces.
>
> We need a new interface, becausethe circuitdocument is subclassed
On Thursday 15 April 2010 21:33:45 P Zoltan wrote:
> Then getting the model is currently not possible. Not a big problem, can
> be fixed with the interfaces.
Yes, I will add it to the IDocument interface today. Patches will follow,
soon.
> Now I'm thinking how hook up the simulator.
>
> Th
Clarifications to my previous email:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:33:45 +0200, P Zoltan
wrote:
>
> Then getting the model is currently not possible. Not a big problem,
> can be fixed with the interfaces.
>
We need a new interface, becausethe circuitdocument is subclassed from
KDevelop::K
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:54:03 +0200, Julian Bäume wrote:
>
> As a next step, I want to have the same thing for circuit files. Reading
> already works, but writing the model to disk is not implemented,yet.
> Zoltan,
> you already started working on implementing tests on this, so I guess,
> we w
hi,
after this weekend and fiddling around with project management, I want to
correct some things I wrote in my last mail:
On Friday 09 April 2010 17:54:51 Julian Bäume wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 April 2010 12:44:51 P Zoltan wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 02:13:51 +0200, Julian Bäume
wrote:
> Cu
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 12:44:51 P Zoltan wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 02:13:51 +0200, Julian Bäume wrote:
> > hi,
> > as promised in irc, I tried to implement some test-cases using
> > KDevPlatform.
> > After fiddling around, hacking around and reverting most of my hacks, I
> > got
> > somethi
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 02:13:51 +0200, Julian Bäume wrote:
> hi,
> as promised in irc, I tried to implement some test-cases using
> KDevPlatform.
> After fiddling around, hacking around and reverting most of my hacks, I
> got
> something working, now. This looks like how I expect a test-case to
hi,
as promised in irc, I tried to implement some test-cases using KDevPlatform.
After fiddling around, hacking around and reverting most of my hacks, I got
something working, now. This looks like how I expect a test-case to look like.
This morning, I'm sure, I had something like that, but it so
