Re: [Ktechlab-devel] bug

2013-09-01 Thread Zoltan Padrah
Hi Alan, On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 19:24:42 +0300, Alan Grimes wrote: > Thanks, zoltan, for putting effort into this. > > I've attached a compile error. I tried to just cmake then make. First I > tried multi-threaded make ( -j 6 ), this was from a single-threaded > attempt. > > just tried a make

[Ktechlab-devel] bug

2013-08-31 Thread Alan Grimes
Thanks, zoltan, for putting effort into this. I've attached a compile error. I tried to just cmake then make. First I tried multi-threaded make ( -j 6 ), this was from a single-threaded attempt. just tried a make clean and re-attempt, basically the same error... -- NOTICE: NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS

[Ktechlab-devel] BUG, down-sizirg MatrixDisplay.

2009-10-18 Thread Alan Grimes
MatrixDisplay aborts/segfaults when you down-size it. I found that last night and made a pathetic attempt to fix it(not comitted). I think the right approach might be in DipComponent. Also, the code in RotarySwitch could probably be improved using the same model. -- New president: Here we go ag

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Bug fixed

2009-10-01 Thread santiago gonzalez
Yess... it's working now :) But then there is a different bug with switches.. i though it was the same bug, becose it has similar behaivor, but this one is still here. I will try to "hunt" it.. :))) 2009/10/1 Alan Grimes > santiago gonzalez wrote: > > Confirmed... the bug was introduced in rev

[Ktechlab-devel] Bug fixed

2009-10-01 Thread Alan Grimes
santiago gonzalez wrote: > Confirmed... the bug was introduced in rev 221. > this time i compiled 220 and the bug is not there, re-downloaded rev 221 > and compiled... and the bug appear. Unsurprisingly, my 3AM diagnosis was completely and utterly wrong. =( There was an ungodly conditional at ele

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] [bug] Ecclockinput won't go above 1khz.

2009-09-20 Thread Alan Grimes
P Zoltan wrote: > Isn't the problem caused by the fact that the simulator has only 1kHz > step frequency? We should separate the real-world time pass speed > (simulator step at 1kHz) and the time flowing inside the circuit. This way > by "slowing" the time inside the circuit, we could simul

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] [bug] Ecclockinput won't go above 1khz.

2009-09-20 Thread P Zoltan
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:32:12 +0200, Alan Grimes wrote: > There's a bug somewhere in or around ecclockinput that prevents it from > working when configured above 1khz. =( > > In other news, I took a crack at my planned refactoring of logic.h/cpp > and ended up removing a metric assload of bugs f

[Ktechlab-devel] [bug] Ecclockinput won't go above 1khz.

2009-09-18 Thread Alan Grimes
There's a bug somewhere in or around ecclockinput that prevents it from working when configured above 1khz. =( In other news, I took a crack at my planned refactoring of logic.h/cpp and ended up removing a metric assload of bugs from simulator. (YAY!) (assuming I didn't also remove critical functi

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] bug: logic randomness

2009-04-23 Thread P Zoltan
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:19:54 +0200, Alan Grimes wrote: > Dragging a new part onto a logic circuit sets many/most of the gates to > random states. =\ > > I was trying to build a dac the hard way. =P damn my circuit got huge, > On the order of 3 dozen parts! =0 > > damn glitchy too, note the dang

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] bug: logic randomness

2009-04-22 Thread Chitlesh GOORAH
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Alan Grimes wrote: > Lemme know if you want the circuit, it's certainly way bigger than > mailing list limits! Hello Alan, I wish to have it. I'm gathering circuits to build a testsuite for ktechlab. Thus I can evaluate and test ktechlab before releasing to fedor

[Ktechlab-devel] bug: logic randomness

2009-04-21 Thread Alan Grimes
Dragging a new part onto a logic circuit sets many/most of the gates to random states. =\ I was trying to build a dac the hard way. =P damn my circuit got huge, On the order of 3 dozen parts! =0 damn glitchy too, note the dangling junction node. =((( I'm really going to have to take a crowbar to

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Bug of the week

2009-04-03 Thread P Zoltan
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:11:11 +0200, Alan Grimes wrote: > P Zoltan wrote: >>Hello people, >> >> >> I've found a very annoying bug, yet I don't really have time to >> investigate it deeply. Here is the entry in the bugtracker: >> https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2687692&gro

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Bug of the week

2009-04-02 Thread Alan Grimes
P Zoltan wrote: >Hello people, > > > I've found a very annoying bug, yet I don't really have time to > investigate it deeply. Here is the entry in the bugtracker: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2687692&group_id=143459&atid=755588 > > . It's about connecting logic

[Ktechlab-devel] Bug of the week

2009-04-02 Thread P Zoltan
Hello people, I've found a very annoying bug, yet I don't really have time to investigate it deeply. Here is the entry in the bugtracker: https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2687692&group_id=143459&atid=755588 . It's about connecting logic outputs together using resisto

[Ktechlab-devel] [bug] gcc 4.2 compile:

2007-07-25 Thread Alan Grimes
/bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=compile --tag=CXX i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../src -I../../src/core -I../../src/electronics -I../../src/electronics/components -I../../src/electronics/simulation -I../../src/flowparts -I../../src/gui -I../../src/languages -I../