[Bug 488911] Re: needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta)

2009-11-29 Thread N7DR
For some rather odd value of the word "fine", yes, they do. Not really relevant to trying to support large projects for server code though, which was the point of my original report. I'm still not sure why this policy has been applied to kdevelop when a quick review of the official repositories i

[Bug 488911] Re: needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta)

2009-11-29 Thread N7DR
OK. Has the person who set that policy actually tried to develop C++ code on karmic? I'll have to go find a distro that supports developers, I guess :-( I don't have time to waste on silliness. I have to produce working code. -- needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta) h

[Bug 488911] Re: needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta)

2009-11-28 Thread Jonathan Thomas
KDevelop3 is unmaintained, and Ubuntu policy states that unmaintained software cannot enter the repositories. ** Changed in: kdevelop (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488911 You received