Alan Cox wrote:
> > - Then, are we certain that there's no case where the tty layer will
> > call us with some lock held or in an atomic context ? To be honest,
> > I've totally lost track of the locking rules in tty land lately so it
> > might well be ok, but something to verify.
>
> Some of the
I'm trying to tinker with vhost_net. I have a 2.6.31-rc4 host kernel patched
to support vhost_net (v5) (along with ksm if it matters). The guest is a
debian-5.0.2 (2.6.26) install CD for now. When the guest tries to load the
virtio-net drivers, kvm closes and prints "vhost_net_init returned -7".
On Friday 28 August 2009 01:14:42 pm Jon Fairbairn wrote:
> I'm experimenting with a virtual router. I did this a few years ago with
> Xen and it worked well enough, but then fedora changed and it stopped
> working, so I gave up for a while. Now I have a machine that supports
> hardware virtualisat
I'm experimenting with a virtual router. I did this a few years ago with
Xen and it worked well enough, but then fedora changed and it stopped
working, so I gave up for a while. Now I have a machine that supports
hardware virtualisation, I thought I'd try again.
The setup was done through virt-man
Ok, applied, thanks!
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Cao, Chen wrote:
> the original version compared a wrong drift value with given threshold.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cao, Chen
> ---
> client/tests/kvm/kvm_tests.py | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/clien
Amit Shah wrote:
On (Tue) Aug 25 2009 [11:47:20], Amit Shah wrote:
Hello all,
Here is a new iteration of the patch series that implements a
transport for guest and host communications.
The code has been updated to reuse the virtio-console device instead
of creating a new virtio-serial devic
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> vhost net module wants to do copy to/from user from a kernel thread,
> which needs use_mm (like what fs/aio has). Move that into mm/ and
> export to modules.
Michael, Andrew,
I am just curious: Is there any technical reason why a kthread cannot
have a long-term use_m
- Change returned handle_invalid_guest_state() to return relevant exit codes
- Move triggering the emulation from vmx_vcpu_run() to vmx_handle_exit()
- Return to userspace instead of repeatedly trying to emulate
instructions that have already failed
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal
---
arch/x86/kvm
Since we return to userspace from KVM on invalid state emulation failure, let
qemu handle it.
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal
---
qemu-kvm.c |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qemu-kvm.c b/qemu-kvm.c
index b59e403..a1648e0 100644
--- a/qemu-kvm.c
+++ b/
Update struct kvm_run and KVM_EXIT_* constants to match the one in the
kernel-space tree
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal
---
kvm/include/linux/kvm.h |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kvm/include/linux/kvm.h b/kvm/include/linux/kvm.h
index ff1025d..80186
Add missing decoder flags for or instructions (0xc-0xd)
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 0644d3d..db0820d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+
Hi all,
running kvm-88 on a 2.6.26-1-amd64 kernel (stock Debian 5.0 kernel), I
get the syslog on the host system flooded with the message:
Aug 28 11:49:40 reactor kernel: [124035.611782] KVM_APIC_READ: read
reserved register b0
The guest is running Debian 5.0 as well. Kernel 2.6.26-2-486. qemu i
the original version compared a wrong drift value with given threshold.
Signed-off-by: Cao, Chen
---
client/tests/kvm/kvm_tests.py |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/client/tests/kvm/kvm_tests.py b/client/tests/kvm/kvm_tests.py
index b100269..4e3391e 100644
On 08/28/2009 10:06 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
Why do we need both, btw? Set your vcpu->requests bit, if guest_mode
is true, clear it and IPI. So guest_mode=false means, we might be in
guest mode but if so we're due for a kick anyway.
No, this introduces a race.
--
I have a truly marvellous pa
On 08/27/2009 05:07 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 04:24:58PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/27/2009 03:45 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Why not bool guest_mode? Saves two atomics per exit.
It must be atomic since GUEST_MODE / VCPU_KICKED bits are manipul
15 matches
Mail list logo