Hello,
I'm no KVM core developer, so please take my advise with a grain of caution.
Am Sonntag 20 Februar 2011 20:32:35 schrieb Nikola Ciprich:
> I've just migrated a bunch of guests from one node to another
> due to upgrading host kernel from 2.6.37 to 2.6.37.1.
> After that, some of guests star
use EFER_SCE, EFER_LME and EFER_LMA instead of magic numbers.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index bcc0efc..9d1d3f2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -81,9 +81,10 @@
* - enable LME and LMA per default on 64 bit KV
Atomic-able hva_to_pfn() patches and allow-read-only-page patches
are merged almost the same time. But hva_to_pfn() does not handle
these two issues well together.
When @atomic && !@write_fault && host-is-read-only-page-mapped
the code will return fault_page, actually, it will be better
if we ret
On 02/21/2011 11:21 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
> The hash array of async gfns may still contain some left gfns after
> kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue() called, need to clear them.
>
sorry.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 17af71d
The hash array of async gfns may still contain some left gfns after
kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue() called, need to clear them.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 17af71d..dae2d15 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -525,8 +525,10 @@ int kvm_s
Hi, Luiz Capitulino
Any problem?
Thanks,
Lai
On 02/14/2011 06:09 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> "cpu-index" which uses hyphen is better name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan
> ---
> diff --git a/hmp-commands.hx b/hmp-commands.hx
> index 5d4cb9e..e43ac7c 100644
> --- a/hmp-commands.hx
> +++ b/hmp
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-02-20 14:08, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:32:31PM -0500, yajin wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I have proposed an idea of GSOC 2011 about adding KVM support to MIPS
>>> architecture. I have solid experience on
Hello,
I've just migrated a bunch of guests from one node to another
due to upgrading host kernel from 2.6.37 to 2.6.37.1.
After that, some of guests started consuming 100% of CPU time and their os
seems to be stuck.
Looks like all the stuck guest were running 2.6.32 with kvm paravirt enabled.
oth
Hi,
I am currently trying to move all emulated devices in an emulated environment
using kvm (0.14~rc1) to their virtio counterparts. Network, block, pci, rng
and 9p were no problem, but the virtualised console gives me a hard time. I
start my image using following options:
$ qemu-system-x86_64
On 2011-02-20 14:08, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:32:31PM -0500, yajin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>
> Hi,
>
>> I have proposed an idea of GSOC 2011 about adding KVM support to MIPS
>> architecture. I have solid experience on MIPS architecture and
>> familiar with qemu. I am very inte
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29382
Avi Kivity changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from Avi
On 02/17/2011 06:16 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:12:43AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> >>index ee1cd1a..541da0e 100644
> >> >>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> >> >>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> >> >>@@ -3437,6 +3437,15 @@ static int handle_interrupt_win
On 02/19/2011 02:02 AM, Cihula, Joseph wrote:
> From: Avi Kivity [mailto:a...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 2:02 AM
>
> On 02/08/2011 09:45 PM, Joseph Cihula wrote:
> > This patch fixes the logic used to detect whether BIOS has disabled VMX.
> >
>
> Applied, thanks.
Will
13 matches
Mail list logo