buildbot failure in kvm on next-i386

2011-04-21 Thread kvm
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of next-i386 on kvm. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/kvm/builders/next-i386/builds/144 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/kvm/ Buildslave for this Build: b1_kvm_1 Build Reason: The Nightly scheduler named 'nightly_nex

buildbot failure in kvm on next-x86_64

2011-04-21 Thread kvm
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of next-x86_64 on kvm. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/kvm/builders/next-x86_64/builds/144 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/kvm/ Buildslave for this Build: b1_kvm_1 Build Reason: The Nightly scheduler named 'nightly

buildbot failure in kvm on i386

2011-04-21 Thread kvm
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of i386 on kvm. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/kvm/builders/i386/builds/155 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/kvm/ Buildslave for this Build: b1_kvm_1 Build Reason: The Nightly scheduler named 'nightly_master' trigg

buildbot failure in kvm on x86_64

2011-04-21 Thread kvm
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of x86_64 on kvm. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/kvm/builders/x86_64/builds/166 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/kvm/ Buildslave for this Build: b1_kvm_1 Build Reason: The Nightly scheduler named 'nightly_master' t

buildbot failure in qemu-kvm on disable_kvm_i386_out_of_tree

2011-04-21 Thread qemu-kvm
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of disable_kvm_i386_out_of_tree on qemu-kvm. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/builders/disable_kvm_i386_out_of_tree/builds/757 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/ Buildslave for this Build: b1_qemu_k

buildbot failure in qemu-kvm on disable_kvm_i386_debian_5_0

2011-04-21 Thread qemu-kvm
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of disable_kvm_i386_debian_5_0 on qemu-kvm. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/builders/disable_kvm_i386_debian_5_0/builds/809 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/ Buildslave for this Build: b1_qemu_kvm

buildbot failure in qemu-kvm on disable_kvm_x86_64_debian_5_0

2011-04-21 Thread qemu-kvm
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of disable_kvm_x86_64_debian_5_0 on qemu-kvm. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/builders/disable_kvm_x86_64_debian_5_0/builds/808 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/ Buildslave for this Build: b1_qemu

buildbot failure in qemu-kvm on disable_kvm_x86_64_out_of_tree

2011-04-21 Thread qemu-kvm
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of disable_kvm_x86_64_out_of_tree on qemu-kvm. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/builders/disable_kvm_x86_64_out_of_tree/builds/757 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/ Buildslave for this Build: b1_qe

RE: kvm make error: macro "wbinvd" passed 1 arguments, but takes just 0

2011-04-21 Thread Ren, Yongjie
Sorry, I found cn...@gmx.de gave a patch in this maillist for this issue. Best Regards, Yongjie Ren(Jay) -Original Message- From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ren, Yongjie Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 9:21 AM To: kvm@vger.kernel.org

kvm make error: macro "wbinvd" passed 1 arguments, but takes just 0

2011-04-21 Thread Ren, Yongjie
Hi, I use kvm.git 51138ead... ( the latest commit in upstream ). I got the following error, could you have a look? Is the code’s issue or my configuration issue ? Thanks a lot.   arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:4095:25: error: macro "wbinvd" passed 1 arguments, but takes just 0   arch/x8

Re: trace-cmd errors on kvm events

2011-04-21 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:07:23PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-04-08 20:53, David Ahern wrote: > > 2.6.38.2 kernel with trace-cmd git pulled this morning: > > > > trace-cmd record -e kvm > > > > trace-cmd report 2>&1 | less > > > > trace-cmd: No such file or directory > > Does this error

nmi is broken?

2011-04-21 Thread OGAWA Hirofumi
Hi, I noticed recently NMI on guest kernel is not working well. host/guest kernel is 2.6.39-rc4, and using vmx. And test code is something like the following: local_irq_disable(); for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) { int cpu = get_cpu(); printk("%s: nmi %u,

[PATCH] KVM: x86 emulator: avoid calling wbinvd() macro

2011-04-21 Thread Clemens Noss
Commit 0b56652e33c72092956c651ab6ceb9f0ad081153 fails to build: CC [M] arch/x86/kvm/emulate.o arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c: In function 'x86_emulate_insn': arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:4095:25: error: macro "wbinvd" passed 1 arguments, but takes just 0 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:4095:3: warning: statement wit

Failed to compile kvm mod

2011-04-21 Thread Michael Stellar
I am running 2.6.37-5.dmz.1-liquorix-amd64 with ubuntu 10.10, and when i am compiling the kvm mod for 2.6.37 kernel it throws the following errors : nano@server:~/Work/kvm-kmod-2.6.37$ make make -C /lib/modules/2.6.37-5.dmz.1-liquorix-amd64/build M=`pwd` \ LINUXINCLUDE="-I`pwd`/include -Ii

Re: device-assignment: difference between assigned_dev_iomem_map and ...map_slow

2011-04-21 Thread Alex Williamson
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 18:23 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi, > > latest qemu-kvm bails out on cleanup as it tries to call > cpu_register_physical_memory with a zero-sized region of an assigned > device. That made me dig into the setup/cleanup of memory mapped io > regions, trying to consolidate and

KVM Forum 2011: Call For Participation

2011-04-21 Thread KVM-Forum-2011-PC
= KVM Forum 2011: Call For Participation August 15-16, 2011 - Hyatt Regency Vancouver - Vancouver, Canada = KVM is an industry leading open source hypervisor that provide

device-assignment: difference between assigned_dev_iomem_map and ...map_slow

2011-04-21 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi, latest qemu-kvm bails out on cleanup as it tries to call cpu_register_physical_memory with a zero-sized region of an assigned device. That made me dig into the setup/cleanup of memory mapped io regions, trying to consolidate and fix the code. What are the differences between normal and slow m

Re: [PATCH v2] intel-iommu: Fix use after release during device attach

2011-04-21 Thread Alex Williamson
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 16:42 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 15:28 +0100, Alex Williamson wrote: > > I've been wondering the exact same thing. My last patch took weeks of > > prodding, finally went into the maintainer's tree without > > acknowledgment, and there's hardly been

[PATCH -next] kvm: fix const value warning on i386

2011-04-21 Thread Randy Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:2598: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap --- arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- linux-next-20110421.orig/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c +++ linux-nex

Re: Failure to compile latest git (target-i386/kvm.c:953:29: error: variable ‘fop’ set but not used)

2011-04-21 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2011-04-21 16:10, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > Fedora 15beta/x64, latest git: > [ykaul@ykaul qemu]$ make > CCx86_64-softmmu/kvm.o > /home/ykaul/qemu/target-i386/kvm.c: In function ‘kvm_get_xsave’: > /home/ykaul/qemu/target-i386/kvm.c:953:29: error: variable ‘fop’ set but > not used [-Werror=unused-

Re: [PATCH v2] intel-iommu: Fix use after release during device attach

2011-04-21 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 15:28 +0100, Alex Williamson wrote: > I've been wondering the exact same thing. My last patch took weeks of > prodding, finally went into the maintainer's tree without > acknowledgment, and there's hardly been any activity there to suggest > a pull request for 2.6.39 is going

[PATCH 1/1 v2] KVM: MMU: Optimize guest page table walk

2011-04-21 Thread Takuya Yoshikawa
From: Takuya Yoshikawa This patch optimizes the guest page table walk by using get_user() instead of copy_from_user(). With this patch applied, paging64_walk_addr_generic() has become about 0.5us to 1.0us faster on my Phenom II machine with NPT on. Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa --- arch/x86

[PATCH 0/1 v2] KVM: MMU: Optimize guest page table walk

2011-04-21 Thread Takuya Yoshikawa
Changelog v1->v2: dropped slot_hint and wrapper. As Avi said, get_user() alone achieved most of the improvement. Before 2.994 us | paging64_walk_addr_generic(); 1.480 us | paging64_walk_addr_generic(); 0.996 us | paging64_walk_addr_generic(); 1.108 us | paging64_walk_addr_gene

Re: How is irq delivered in kvm?

2011-04-21 Thread Avi Kivity
On 04/21/2011 05:23 PM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 04/21/2011 04:49 PM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a specialized e1000 device driver that expects to receive a >> single frame per interrupt, no more. It's by desi

Re: Does macvtap support host to guest communication?

2011-04-21 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 19 April 2011, Ashish Saxena wrote: > @Arnd, I would like to initiate the dig into into macvtap driver. Could you > please provide me some pointers/docs to start with. I dont' have any general recommendations. I'd suggest you start reading the macvlan.c and macvtap.c source code and co

Re: [PATCH v2] intel-iommu: Fix use after release during device attach

2011-04-21 Thread Alex Williamson
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 14:32 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-01-04 11:42, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Am 10.12.2010 19:44, Chris Wright wrote: > >> * Jan Kiszka (jan.kis...@siemens.com) wrote: > >> --- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c > >> +++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c > >> @@ -3627,9 +3627,9

Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] macvtap/vhost TX zero copy support

2011-04-21 Thread Jon Mason
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Shirley Ma wrote: > This patchset add supports for TX zero-copy between guest and host > kernel through vhost. It significantly reduces CPU utilization on the > local host on which the guest is located (It reduced 30-50% CPU usage > for vhost thread for single stre

Re: How is irq delivered in kvm?

2011-04-21 Thread Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 04/21/2011 04:49 PM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a specialized e1000 device driver that expects to receive a >> single frame per interrupt, no more. It's by design and very hard to >> change (and it does not serve IP tr

Re: [PATCH] kvm tools: Add option to specify backing storage for RAM

2011-04-21 Thread Avi Kivity
On 04/21/2011 04:12 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: > This can also be extended to use hugetlbfs. Recent Linux kernels support transparent hugepages so you can do MADV_HUGEPAGE on mmap'd memory. Note, it has to be aligned correctly (to a 2M boundar

Re: How is irq delivered in kvm?

2011-04-21 Thread Avi Kivity
On 04/21/2011 04:49 PM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: Hi, I have a specialized e1000 device driver that expects to receive a single frame per interrupt, no more. It's by design and very hard to change (and it does not serve IP traffic). -net socket or tap can sometimes deliver more than one frame

Re: [PATCH] kvm tools: Add option to specify backing storage for RAM

2011-04-21 Thread Sasha Levin
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 16:12 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Well, I don't still quite see the point of this feature. Is there some > real world use for running guests with huge memory space that's > swap-backed? Not a single guest, but multiple guests which take more RAM than the host can provide usi

Re: [PATCH v2] intel-iommu: Fix use after release during device attach

2011-04-21 Thread Chris Wright
* Jan Kiszka (jan.kis...@siemens.com) wrote: > On 2011-01-04 11:42, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Am 10.12.2010 19:44, Chris Wright wrote: > >> * Jan Kiszka (jan.kis...@siemens.com) wrote: > >> --- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c > >> +++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c > >> @@ -3627,9 +3627,9 @@ stati

How is irq delivered in kvm?

2011-04-21 Thread Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
Hi, I have a specialized e1000 device driver that expects to receive a single frame per interrupt, no more. It's by design and very hard to change (and it does not serve IP traffic). -net socket or tap can sometimes deliver more than one frame in a row and blow up the driver in turn. I'd like to e

Re: [PATCH] kvm tools: Add option to specify backing storage for RAM

2011-04-21 Thread Pekka Enberg
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: > It's an alternative to creating more swap. > When using large RAM sizes for guests on hosts with limited physical > RAM/swap this option gives the user a way to use files instead of swap. Well, I don't still quite see the point of this feature

Re: performance of virtual functions compared to virtio

2011-04-21 Thread Avi Kivity
On 04/21/2011 03:31 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > Note I think in both cases we can make significant improvements: > - for VFs, steer device interrupts to the cpus which run the vcpus that will > receive the interrupts eventually (ISTR some wo

Re: [PATCH] kvm tools: Add option to specify backing storage for RAM

2011-04-21 Thread Sasha Levin
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 15:48 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: > > Add --use-backing to allow for the usage of a temporary backing file for > > guest RAM. > > A temporary file is created and aollocated under /tmp and is used to back > > the RAM memor

Re: [PATCH] kvm tools: Add option to specify backing storage for RAM

2011-04-21 Thread Pekka Enberg
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: > Add --use-backing to allow for the usage of a temporary backing file for > guest RAM. > A temporary file is created and aollocated under /tmp and is used to back the > RAM memory which is mmaped for the guest. > There should be enough storage

[PATCH] kvm tools: Add option to specify backing storage for RAM

2011-04-21 Thread Sasha Levin
Add --use-backing to allow for the usage of a temporary backing file for guest RAM. A temporary file is created and aollocated under /tmp and is used to back the RAM memory which is mmaped for the guest. There should be enough storage space under /tmp to use this option (at least the size of the

Re: [PATCH] kvm tools: Use mmap to allocate guest RAM

2011-04-21 Thread Pekka Enberg
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: > Using mmap to allocate the RAM enables us to allocate large blocks of memory > for the guest, allowing to boot guests with a large RAM. > Since if we try KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION with a large memory block KVM used > to Oops (now it just fai

[Bug 27052] Module KVM : unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at

2011-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27052 --- Comment #41 from prochazka 2011-04-21 12:39:11 --- Hi, I never test #38 from avi kivity suggest, and now i suppres all bridge ( brctl) and netfilter configuration from my server, i'm using openvswitch without this problem. Regards,

[PATCH] kvm tools: Use mmap to allocate guest RAM

2011-04-21 Thread Sasha Levin
Using mmap to allocate the RAM enables us to allocate large blocks of memory for the guest, allowing to boot guests with a large RAM. Since if we try KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION with a large memory block KVM used to Oops (now it just fails), we had to move the actual ioctl to after we KVM_CREATE_

[PATCH v2] intel-iommu: Fix use after release during device attach

2011-04-21 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2011-01-04 11:42, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Am 10.12.2010 19:44, Chris Wright wrote: >> * Jan Kiszka (jan.kis...@siemens.com) wrote: >> --- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c >> @@ -3627,9 +3627,9 @@ static int intel_iommu_attach_device(struct >> iommu_domai

Re: performance of virtual functions compared to virtio

2011-04-21 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > Note I think in both cases we can make significant improvements: > - for VFs, steer device interrupts to the cpus which run the vcpus that will > receive the interrupts eventually (ISTR some work about this, but not sure) > - for virtio, use a D

[Bug 27052] Module KVM : unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at

2011-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27052 --- Comment #40 from Avi Kivity 2011-04-21 12:13:33 --- (In reply to comment #39) > Is this issue resolved? > I'm seeing almost the same issue with 2.6.38 + qemu-kvm-0.14.0 (on NEC > Express5800/110Ge server), except that my backtrace is call

[Bug 27052] Module KVM : unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at

2011-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27052 Taisuke Yamada changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tai.ker...@cc.rakugaki.org --- Comme

[Bug 33762] Qemu-kvm infinite loop on hardened (Grsecurity/PaX) kernel

2011-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33762 Anton Kochkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

RE: [PATCH] KVM: Add CPUID support for VIA CPU

2011-04-21 Thread BrillyWu
Hi, Avi I'm sorry to reply you a little late. I spent some time on finding information to fix the EFLAGS[30] issue, and I have got it now. Here is some comment from Centaur.: EFLAGS:30 was used on C7 but not by Nano. EFLAGS:30 is undefined for Intel. C7 used it as a way of improving performa

[PATCH] KVM: SVM: Get rid of x86_intercept_map::valid

2011-04-21 Thread Avi Kivity
By reserving 0 as an invalid x86_intercept_stage, we no longer need to store a valid flag in x86_intercept_map. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity --- arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |1 + arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 12 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) dif

[PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86 emulator: Use opcode::execute for 0F 01 opcode

2011-04-21 Thread Avi Kivity
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity --- arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 56 +++ 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c index e8f146d..522b4a5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c +++ b/arch/x86/k

[PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86 emulator: Don't force #UD for 0F 01 /5

2011-04-21 Thread Avi Kivity
While it isn't defined, no need to force a #UD. If it becomes defined in the future this can cause wierd problems for the guest. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity --- arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c |3 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/

[PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86 emulator: move 0F 01 sub-opcodes into their own functions

2011-04-21 Thread Avi Kivity
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity --- arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 146 --- 1 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c index f683ce1..bf4284d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c +++ b/arch/x86/k

[PATCH 0/3] Convert 0F 01 opcodes to opcode::execute

2011-04-21 Thread Avi Kivity
A little step towards removing the big switch (). Avi Kivity (3): KVM: x86 emulator: move 0F 01 sub-opcodes into their own functions KVM: x86 emulator: Don't force #UD for 0F 01 /5 KVM: x86 emulator: Use opcode::execute for 0F 01 opcode arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 169 +++

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: Use pci_store/load_saved_state() around VM device usage

2011-04-21 Thread Avi Kivity
On 04/20/2011 11:31 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: Store the device saved state so that we can reload the device back to the original state when it's unassigned. This has the benefit that the state survives across pci_reset_function() calls via the PCI sysfs reset interface while the VM is using the

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Store and load PCI device saved state across function resets

2011-04-21 Thread Avi Kivity
On 04/20/2011 11:31 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: v2 -> v3: Saved structure has variable contents. Avi, see if this adds any credibility to the pci-core allocated opaque buffer. It was wrong in the previous versions to distill the variable device capability save list into a fixed struct. This

Re: How to use qemu-kvm with Fedora15-beta gnome3 (better vga driver ?)

2011-04-21 Thread Cheng Renquan
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 04/21/2011 05:40 AM, Cheng Renquan wrote: >> >> I'm trying to use qemu-kvm to run Fedora15-beta with gnome3, >> but it told me graphics hardware failed to run gnome3 specific >> features and it fallback to gnome2; > > Sorry, none of the c

Re: [PATCH] kvm, ioapic: Fix an error field reference

2011-04-21 Thread Avi Kivity
On 04/21/2011 09:53 AM, Liu Yuan wrote: From: Liu Yuan Function ioapic_debug() in the ioapic_deliver() misnames one filed by reference. This patch correct it. Applied, thanks. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu

Re: [PATCH] KVM: MMU: Make cmpxchg_gpte aware of nesting too

2011-04-21 Thread Avi Kivity
On 04/21/2011 04:02 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:33:16 +0200 "Roedel, Joerg" wrote: > @@ -245,13 +257,17 @@ walk: >goto error; > >if (write_fault&& !is_dirty_gpte(pte)) { > - bool ret; > + int ret; > >trace_kvm_mmu_set_dirty_

Re: performance of virtual functions compared to virtio

2011-04-21 Thread Avi Kivity
On 04/21/2011 05:35 AM, Alex Williamson wrote: Device assignment via a VF provides the lowest latency and most bandwidth for *getting data off the host system*, though virtio/vhost is getting better. If all you care about is VM-VM on the same host or VM-host, then virtio is only limited by memor

Re: How to use qemu-kvm with Fedora15-beta gnome3 (better vga driver ?)

2011-04-21 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 04/21/2011 05:40 AM, Cheng Renquan wrote: I'm trying to use qemu-kvm to run Fedora15-beta with gnome3, but it told me graphics hardware failed to run gnome3 specific features and it fallback to gnome2; Sorry, none of the cards provided by KVM (including the SPICE-specific QXL card) currentl

[Autotest PATCH] KVM-test: TSC drift test

2011-04-21 Thread Amos Kong
This case is used to test the drift between host and guest. Use taskset to make tsc program execute in a single cpu. If the drift ratio bigger than 10%, then fail this case. Signed-off-by: Amos Kong --- client/tests/kvm/deps/get_tsc.c| 27 ++ client/tests/kvm/tests/tsc_drift.py