This patch checks SMEP on prefetch pte path when
cr0.wp=1 and cr0.wp=0.
Signed-off-by: Yang, Wei wei.y.y...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Li, Xin xin...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Shan, Haitao haitao.s...@intel.com
---
x86/access.c | 92 ++--
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 01:20:53PM -0400, Chris Wright wrote:
* David Woodhouse (dw...@infradead.org) wrote:
I'd much rather KVM just gave us a list of the pages to map, in a single
call.
This makes most sense to me.
But how is this supposed to work with arbitrary page-sizes? When we
2011/6/23 Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de:
On 2011-06-23 15:56, lidong chen wrote:
is it safe to register another signal handler?
if somebody know the reason, please tell me.
and is it worth to do this?
because the core dump file is too big, and the time of core dump is too long.
I do a test,
On 2011-06-24 10:24, lidong chen wrote:
2011/6/23 Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de:
On 2011-06-23 15:56, lidong chen wrote:
is it safe to register another signal handler?
if somebody know the reason, please tell me.
and is it worth to do this?
because the core dump file is too big, and the
On 2011-06-24 10:55, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-24 10:24, lidong chen wrote:
2011/6/23 Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de:
On 2011-06-23 15:56, lidong chen wrote:
is it safe to register another signal handler?
if somebody know the reason, please tell me.
and is it worth to do this?
because
On 06/24/2011 03:16 PM, Yang, Wei wrote:
+void set_cr4_smep(int smep)
+{
+unsigned long cr4 = read_cr4();
+
+cr4 = ~CR4_SMEP_MASK;
+if (smep)
+ cr4 |= CR4_SMEP_MASK;
+write_cr4(cr4);
+}
+
It can work if the box does not support SMEP?
void set_efer_nx(int nx)
{
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:24:02PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
The virtio block device holds a lock during I/O request processing.
Kicking the
On 06/16/2011 03:29 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Asias He asias.he...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/16/2011 05:33 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
Send signals only to the thread which handles console injection
instead of the entire process.
This prevents every single thread from having to ignore SIGALRM
and
2011/6/24 Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com:
On 2011-06-24 10:55, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-24 10:24, lidong chen wrote:
2011/6/23 Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de:
On 2011-06-23 15:56, lidong chen wrote:
is it safe to register another signal handler?
if somebody know the reason, please tell
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
The protocol data is in little-endian format.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
tools/kvm/Makefile|1 +
tools/kvm/include/kvm/virtio-9p.h | 81 ++-
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:47:18 -0400, Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
The protocol data is in little-endian format.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
tools/kvm/Makefile
LGTM, applied, thanks!
http://autotest.kernel.org/changeset/5450
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Qingtang Zhou qz...@redhat.com wrote:
monitor socket will be initiated at the beginning of '*Monitor.__init__',
if exception occur in this function, socket will not be closed correctly.
In this
Is anyone working on SR-IOV for KVM, specifically for networking? Or is
virtio good enough that it's not a pressing concern?
Thanks,
Chris
--
Chris Friesen
Software Developer
GENBAND
chris.frie...@genband.com
www.genband.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 21:30 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:47:18 -0400, Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
+static void virtio_p9_pdu_read(struct p9_pdu *pdu, void *data, size_t
size)
+{
+
I have tested the performance of sr-iov for kvm, it better than virtio-net.
2011/6/25 Chris Friesen chris.frie...@genband.com:
Is anyone working on SR-IOV for KVM, specifically for networking? Or is
virtio good enough that it's not a pressing concern?
Thanks,
Chris
--
Chris Friesen
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 15:10 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
Is anyone working on SR-IOV for KVM, specifically for networking? Or is
virtio good enough that it's not a pressing concern?
What exactly are you missing now?
Thanks,
Chris
--
Sasha.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Hi,
Does anyone successfully use USB drive in Windows7 guest? If I pass a
USB drive to Windows7 guest, Device Manager may find this device but
the USB mass storage driver can't be installed successfully. I have
tried many times. Is the emulated USB controller is so old and
Windows7 doesn't
+void set_cr4_smep(int smep)
+{
+unsigned long cr4 = read_cr4();
+
+cr4 = ~CR4_SMEP_MASK;
+if (smep)
+ cr4 |= CR4_SMEP_MASK;
+write_cr4(cr4);
+}
+
It can work if the box does not support SMEP?
It will report unhandled exception 13 in access.out which
we
18 matches
Mail list logo