On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:05:17PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 23:00:44 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 07:33:07PM +0300, Sasha Levin wrote:
Maybe this is better solved by copying the way it was done in PCI itself
with
On 09/16/11 18:22, Thomas Beinicke wrote:
I am experiencing the same problem with version 0.15 while 0.14 works flawless.
We're using it for an USB ISDN card which freezes the windows host with qemu-kvm 0.15
when plugged in while the system is already running or it completely prevents
the
Hotplug multi-func device doesn't work, only func 0 are regiestered
to guest pci driver, this patchset just add device entry in ACPI
DSDT tables for all functions in the slot.
---
Amos Kong (2):
Fix regression of commit 87b533bf
hotplug: Add device per func in ACPI DSDT tables
0
After adding more device entries in ACPI DSDT tables,
the filesize of bios.bin changed from 128K to 256K.
But bios could not initialize successfully.
This is a regression since seabios commit 87b533bf. Prior to
that commit, seabios did not mark the early 32bit initialization
code as init code.
Only func 0 is registered to guest driver (we can
only found func 0 in slot-funcs list of driver),
the other functions could not be cleaned when
hot-removing the whole slot. This patch adds
device per function in ACPI DSDT tables.
Have tested with linux/winxp/win7, hot-adding/hot-remving,
On 14 September 2011 16:07, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
I would like to carry out an online code review of the memory API so that
more people are familiar with the internals, and perhaps even to catch some
bugs or deficiency. I'd like to use the next kvm conference call slot for
this
On 09/18/2011 03:17 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 02:02:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
A wiki-page was created to narrate the detail design of all parts
involved in the multi queue implementation:
http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue and some basic tests result
could
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:36:44PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:53:47PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
Only func 0 is registered to guest driver (we can
only found func 0 in slot-funcs list of driver),
the other functions could not be cleaned when
hot-removing the
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:09:46AM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 06:11:07PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
Note:
1.)
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:27:38AM -0400, Amos Kong wrote:
Only func 0 is registered to guest driver (we can
only found func 0 in slot-funcs list of driver),
the other functions could not be cleaned when
hot-removing the whole slot. This patch adds
device per function in ACPI DSDT tables.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:57:33PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:27:38AM -0400, Amos Kong wrote:
Only func 0 is registered to guest driver (we can
only found func 0 in slot-funcs list of driver),
the other functions could not be cleaned when
hot-removing the
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:36:44PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:53:47PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
Only func 0 is registered to guest driver (we can
only found func 0 in slot-funcs list of driver),
the other functions could not be cleaned when
hot-removing the
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:02:59PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:57:33PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:27:38AM -0400, Amos Kong wrote:
Only func 0 is registered to guest driver (we can
only found func 0 in slot-funcs list of
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:12:30PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:02:59PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:57:33PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:27:38AM -0400, Amos Kong wrote:
Only func 0 is registered to
Hi !
Here's my config :
Version : qemu-kvm-0.12.5, qemu-kvm-0.12.4
Hosts : AMD 64X2, Phenom and Core 2 duo
OS : Slackware 64 13.0
Kernel : 2.6.35.4 and many previous versions
I use a PXE server to boot semi-diskless (swap partitions and some local
stuff) stations.
This server also
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:32:48PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
I recall I saw some examples like this on the net.
Checking real HW DSDT will validate that we are doing a right thing here.
According to Microsoft own documentation they want _EJ0 for each
function:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 08:48:58PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/15/2011 08:25 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
I think so. Suppose the vcpu enters just after kvm_make_request(); it
sees KVM_REQ_EVENT and clears it, but doesn't see nmi_pending because it
wasn't set set. Then comes a kick, the
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:19:51PM +0800, Zhao Jin wrote:
__update_clear_spte_slow should return original spte while the
current code returns low half of original spte combined with high
half of new spte.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Jin crono...@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |3 ++-
1
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Hagen Paul Pfeifer ha...@jauu.net wrote:
7eeef124e30ca2123f removes setnet.sh handling through build-in nfs dhcp
client. This patch get rid of kvm setup functionality to copy the now
non-existing setnet script. Otherwise kvm setup is silently aborted.
On 09/19/2011 04:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Yes, due to NMI-blocked-by-STI. A really touchy area.
And we don't need the window exit notification then? I don't understand
what nmi_in_progress is supposed to do here.
We need the window notification in both cases. If we're
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:02 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
[...]
2 Current implementation may also get regression for single session
packet transmission.
The reason is packets from each flow were not handled by the same
queue/vhost thread.
Various method could be done to handle this:
2.1
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 05:30:27PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/19/2011 04:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Yes, due to NMI-blocked-by-STI. A really touchy area.
And we don't need the window exit notification then? I don't understand
what nmi_in_progress is supposed to do here.
On 09/19/2011 05:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 05:30:27PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/19/2011 04:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Yes, due to NMI-blocked-by-STI. A really touchy area.
And we don't need the window exit notification then? I don't
On 09/19/2011 06:09 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/19/2011 05:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 05:30:27PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/19/2011 04:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Yes, due to NMI-blocked-by-STI. A really touchy area.
And we don't need the window
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 08:11 -0500, Stuart Yoder wrote:
Based on the discussions over the last couple of weeks
I have updated the device fd file layout proposal and
tried to specify it a bit more formally.
===
1. Overview
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 06:09:39PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/19/2011 05:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 05:30:27PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/19/2011 04:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Yes, due to NMI-blocked-by-STI. A really touchy area.
On 09/19/2011 06:22 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 06:09:39PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/19/2011 05:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 05:30:27PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/19/2011 04:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 06:37:35PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/19/2011 06:22 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 06:09:39PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/19/2011 05:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 05:30:27PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:02:59PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:57:33PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:27:38AM -0400, Amos Kong wrote:
Only func 0 is registered to guest driver (we can
only found func 0 in slot-funcs list of
Sorry for the delay, just getting back from LPC and some time off...
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 10:52 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
+static long vfio_iommu_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
+unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
+{
+ struct vfio_iommu *viommu =
On Sunday 18 Sep 2011 02:21:04 Amos Kong wrote:
Users may boot up a QEMU guest without default mac address, it's easy to
repeat, it always to be failed to get IP with PXE boot.
RFC suggests us to use random xid, it's necessary. This patch generates
random id when start dhcp, and record it to
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:38:28PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Since master.kernel.org is down for maintenance, I've set up
temporary repositories on github:
git://github.com/avikivity/kvm.git
git://github.com/avikivity/qemu.git
Please use these instead of kvm.git and qemu-kvm.git until
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:27:25PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:02:59PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:57:33PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:27:38AM -0400, Amos Kong wrote:
Only func 0 is registered to
On 09/19/2011 10:16 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 08:11 -0500, Stuart Yoder wrote:
2. Header
The header is located at offset 0x0 in the device fd
and has the following format:
struct devfd_header {
__u32 magic;
__u32 version;
__u32 flags;
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:37 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2011 10:16 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 08:11 -0500, Stuart Yoder wrote:
2. Header
The header is located at offset 0x0 in the device fd
and has the following format:
struct devfd_header {
On 09/19/2011 04:07 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:37 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
A DTPATH as a record, an INTERRUPT as a sub-record, etc.
Same as any other unrecognized (sub)record type, you ignore it -- but
the kernel should not be generating this.
I'm trying to express
Does any one know how to do this? thank you kindly
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:40 PM, day knight back2ga...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible and if yes then how.
Can we increase the memory on a live guest machine without having to
shutdown or reboot as well as increase and decrease CPUs. if it
The Capabilities Pointer is NULL, so this bit shouldn't be set. The state of
this bit doesn't appear to change any behavior on Linux/Windows versions we've
tested, but it does cause Windows' PCI/PCI Express Compliance Test to balk.
I happen to have a physical 82540EM controller, and it also sets
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:01:50 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:05:17PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 23:00:44 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 07:33:07PM +0300, Sasha Levin wrote:
With hugetlbfs support emerging on e500, we should also support KVM
backing its guest memory by it.
This patch adds support for hugetlbfs into the e500 shadow mmu code.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_tlb.c | 22 ++
1 files changed, 22
On 9/19/11, day knight back2ga...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible and if yes then how.
Can we increase the memory on a live guest machine without having to
shutdown or reboot as well as increase and decrase CPUs. if it is
possible, can some one point me to the documentation :)
Chipping in my
On 15.09.2011, at 20:26, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/05/2011 05:28 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
+ /*
+* SPRG4-7 are user-readable, so we can't keep these
+* consistent between the magic page and the real
+* registers. We provide space in case the guest
+* can deal with this.
+
On 15.09.2011, at 22:52, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/08/2011 10:39 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 08.09.2011, at 17:34, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 12:41:35PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Yes, but why can't we do this in the vcpu thread's context so we only
ever have a single
With hugetlbfs support emerging on e500, we should also support KVM
backing its guest memory by it.
This patch adds support for hugetlbfs into the e500 shadow mmu code.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_tlb.c | 22 ++
1 files changed, 22
44 matches
Mail list logo
