On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:05:21 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:30:28 +0800, Zhi Yong Wu
>> wrote:
>> > qemu build break due to the redefinition of struct file_handle. My
>> > qemu.git/HEAD is 8acbc9b21d757a
Hi Joerg,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> The master branch is best to base your patches on for generic work.
Done. I've revised the patches and attached the main one
below; please tell me if it looks ok, and then I'll resubmit the
entire patch set.
Thanks,
Ohad.
commit
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
>> The master branch is best to base your patches on for generic work.
It looks like the master branch is missing something like this:
>From acb316aa4bcaf383e8cb1580e30c8635e0a34369 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen
Date: Mon,
Hy,
I have some strange entries in syslog, to which I couldnt really find
any information on google. One forum said to disable apparmor, but I
havent any running on system:
root@muramasa:~# grep libvirt /var/log/syslog
Oct 10 12:03:55 muramasa libvirtd: 12:03:55.308: warning :
qemudParsePCIDeviceSt
On 10/10/2011 12:32 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> On 10/06/2011 10:40 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> However, it looks like locked xadd is also has better performance: on
>>> my Sandybridge laptop (2 cores, 4 threads), the add+mfence is 20% slower
>>> than locked
On 10/10/2011 07:01 AM, Stephan Diestelhorst wrote:
> On Monday 10 October 2011, 07:00:50 Stephan Diestelhorst wrote:
>> On Thursday 06 October 2011, 13:40:01 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> On 10/06/2011 07:04 AM, Stephan Diestelhorst wrote:
On Wednesday 28 September 2011, 14:49:56 Linus Torva
Hi Joerg,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> The master branch is best to base your patches on for generic work.
Oh, great. thanks.
> It can happen when there is a bug somewhere :)
Hmm, bug ? ;)
Ok, I'll add a BUG_ON :)
> Yes, somthing like that. Probably the iommu_ops->
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:05:21 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:30:28 +0800, Zhi Yong Wu
> wrote:
> > qemu build break due to the redefinition of struct file_handle. My
> > qemu.git/HEAD is 8acbc9b21d757a6be4f8492e547b8159703a0547
> >
> > Below is the log:
> > [root@f15
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:30:28 +0800, Zhi Yong Wu
wrote:
> qemu build break due to the redefinition of struct file_handle. My
> qemu.git/HEAD is 8acbc9b21d757a6be4f8492e547b8159703a0547
>
> Below is the log:
> [root@f15 qemu]# make
> CCqapi-generated/qga-qapi-types.o
> LINK qemu-ga
> C
The kvm_host struct can include an mmu_notifier struct but mmu_notifier.h is
not included directly.
Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson
---
include/linux/kvm_host.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index eabb21a
On 10/10/2011 05:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Ok. So bumping the version is only right if we don't fix subsections.
If we bump *any* version from 0.15 -> 1.0, then there's no point at
all in having a subsection.
Did we bump versions of relevant devices?
If we break compatibility by using
On 10/10/2011 10:24 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/10/2011 05:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 10/10/2011 10:00 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/10/2011 04:55 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hrm, sorry about that. In the future, it would be helpful to explicitly
withdrawal a PULL request.
Do you want me
Hi Ohad,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:59:22AM -0400, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> > Also, the bus_set_iommu interface is now in the -next branch. Would be
> > good if you rebase the patches to that interface.
>
> Sure. It's a little tricky though: which branch do I base this on ?
> Are you ok with me ba
On 10/10/2011 05:10 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
It's irreversible, once we release a version with a bumped ID we
can't go back.
But the question is whether we've bumped *any* versions of common
devices since 0.15 because if so, it's moot here.
What's the answer? And if the answer is we did
On 10/10/2011 05:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 10/10/2011 10:00 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/10/2011 04:55 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hrm, sorry about that. In the future, it would be helpful to explicitly
withdrawal a PULL request.
Do you want me to revert?
We'll send the revert together
On 10/10/2011 10:00 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/10/2011 04:55 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hrm, sorry about that. In the future, it would be helpful to explicitly
withdrawal a PULL request.
Do you want me to revert?
We'll send the revert together with the new patch.
FWIW, I think bumping the
On 10/10/2011 09:58 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/10/2011 04:54 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 10/04/2011 05:20 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 07:53:42PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/03/2011 10:55 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
From: "Liu, Jinsong"
KVM add emulation of lapic t
Add a Ubuntu 11.04 server variant, with unattended install set.
With this, it's possible to install the latest Ubuntu server
(as of the time of this patch). A preseed file comes together.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
---
client/tests/kvm/guest-os.cfg.sample | 34
This patchset adds support to debian preseed files
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Preseed
Comes with Ubuntu server 11.04 support. Later, more
patches adding Debian and other Ubuntu server variants
will be added.
This patchset was also sent as a pull request
https://github.com/autotest/a
Add support to debian preseed
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Preseed
unattended install file format. In order to get fully
automated d-i automation, we are using initrd preseed
method (add a preseed.cfg file on top of the initrd
filesystem). Tested with Ubuntu server 11.04, will add
other
On 10/10/2011 04:55 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hrm, sorry about that. In the future, it would be helpful to
explicitly withdrawal a PULL request.
Do you want me to revert?
We'll send the revert together with the new patch.
FWIW, I think bumping the version is the right thing to do.
W
On 10/10/2011 04:54 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 10/04/2011 05:20 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 07:53:42PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/03/2011 10:55 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
From: "Liu, Jinsong"
KVM add emulation of lapic tsc deadline timer for guest.
This patch is
On 10/10/2011 09:48 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/10/2011 04:41 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 10/03/2011 03:55 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
The following changes since commit d11cf8cc80d946dfc9a23597cd9a0bb1c487cfa7:
etrax-dma: Remove bogus if statement (2011-10-03 10:20:13 +0200)
are available i
On 10/04/2011 05:20 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 07:53:42PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/03/2011 10:55 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
From: "Liu, Jinsong"
KVM add emulation of lapic tsc deadline timer for guest.
This patch is co-operation work at qemu side.
-#define CPU_SA
On 10/10/2011 04:41 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 10/03/2011 03:55 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
The following changes since commit
d11cf8cc80d946dfc9a23597cd9a0bb1c487cfa7:
etrax-dma: Remove bogus if statement (2011-10-03 10:20:13 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://githu
On 10/03/2011 03:55 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
The following changes since commit d11cf8cc80d946dfc9a23597cd9a0bb1c487cfa7:
etrax-dma: Remove bogus if statement (2011-10-03 10:20:13 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://github.com/avikivity/qemu.git uq/master
Pulled. Tha
On Monday 10 October 2011, 07:00:50 Stephan Diestelhorst wrote:
> On Thursday 06 October 2011, 13:40:01 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > On 10/06/2011 07:04 AM, Stephan Diestelhorst wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 28 September 2011, 14:49:56 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >> Which certainly should *work*, but f
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:52 PM, KyongHo Cho wrote:
> Do not we need to unmap all intermediate mappings if iommu_map() is failed?
Good idea, I'll add it.
Thanks!
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More maj
[ -bouncing hiroshi.d...@nokia.com, +not-bouncing hd...@nvidia.com :
hi Hiroshi :) ]
Hi Joerg,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> sorry, I was on vacation last week and had no time to look into this.
Sure thing, thanks for replying!
>> +#include
>
> Is this still require
On 09/22/2011 12:04 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> goto out;
>
> +if (!kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_ASSIGN_DEV_IRQ)&&
> +(dev->cap.available& ASSIGNED_DEVICE_CAP_MSIX ||
> + dev->cap.available& ASSIGNED_DEVICE_CAP_MSI ||
> + assigned_dev_pci_read_byt
On 10/05/2011 10:29 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>
> #
> # (For a higher level overview, try: perf report --sort comm,dso)
> #
>
> How helpful is that? -_-
>
> I'm guessing I need --guestkallsyms= ; since they're all the same
> kernel I thought it'd figure it out. I'll redo.
OK, here's a
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> int iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
> - phys_addr_t paddr, int gfp_order, int prot)
> + phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size, int prot)
> {
> - size_t size;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> +
Hi
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Thanks, Juan.
pgp2ZkeuIbtbB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 06 October 2011, 13:40:01 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 10/06/2011 07:04 AM, Stephan Diestelhorst wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 September 2011, 14:49:56 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> Which certainly should *work*, but from a conceptual standpoint, isn't
> >> it just *much* nicer to say "we
I thought about that. But pci_add is not much stable and it's not
supported in QMP (as far as I read) with a note that this way is buggy
and should be rewritten completely. So I placed it here to let it
develop and then I can move it into utils.
Regards,
Lukáš
Dne 10.10.2011 12:26, Jiri Zupka
Hi Gleb,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 08:01:15AM -0400, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> This patch series consists of Joerg series named "perf support for amd
> guest/host-only bits v2" [1] rebased to 3.1.0-rc7 and in addition,
> support for intel cpus for the same functionality.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2
On 10/07/2011 09:37 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Taken from original qemu-kvm/kvm/scripts/vmxcap.
Applied, thanks.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
On 10/07/2011 09:37 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Taken from original qemu-kvm/kvm/kvm_stat.
Applied, thanks.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More m
qemu build break due to the redefinition of struct file_handle. My
qemu.git/HEAD is 8acbc9b21d757a6be4f8492e547b8159703a0547
Below is the log:
[root@f15 qemu]# make
CCqapi-generated/qga-qapi-types.o
LINK qemu-ga
CClibhw64/9pfs/virtio-9p-handle.o
/home/zwu/work/virt/qemu/hw/9pfs/vir
On 10/09/2011 05:32 PM, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Updated test case for kvm tsc deadline timer
https://github.com/avikivity/kvm-unit-tests, as attached.
Applied, thanks.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm
On 10/09/2011 06:02 PM, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Subject: [PATCH] Update README example
Thanks, applied.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More maj
This is useful function. This function can be in kvm utils.
- Original Message -
> * functions for adding and removal of drive to vm using host-file or
>host-scsi_debug device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Doktor
> ---
> client/tests/kvm/tests/cgroup.py | 125
> +++
On 10/10/2011 08:06 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
From: Kenji Kaneshige
Currently, NMI interrupt is blindly sent to all the vCPUs when NMI
button event happens. This doesn't properly emulate real hardware on
which NMI button event triggers LINT1. Because of this, NMI is sent to
the processor even whe
On 2011-10-10 11:40, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 08:54 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-10-09 20:52, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
>>> ---
>>> qemu-options.hx | 23 +++
>>> vl.c|2 ++
>>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>
Hi Ohad,
sorry, I was on vacation last week and had no time to look into this.
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 11:58:12AM -0400, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 138 ---
> drivers/iommu/omap-iovmm.c | 12 +---
> include/linux/iommu.h |
Am 10.10.2011 08:49, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
On 2011-10-10 08:06, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
From: Kenji Kaneshige
Currently, NMI interrupt is blindly sent to all the vCPUs when NMI
button event happens. This doesn't properly emulate real hardware on
which NMI button event triggers LINT1. Because of this
On 10/08/2011 09:46 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
We do not want to maintain this option forever. It will be removed after
a grace period of a few releases. So warn the user that this option has
no effect and will become invalid soon.
Thanks, applied.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many argument
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 08:54 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-10-09 20:52, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > ---
> > qemu-options.hx | 23 +++
> > vl.c|2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.h
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 08:53 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-10-09 20:52, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > Enable some basic Hyper-V enlightenment functionalites,
> > including relaxed timing, spinlock, and virtual APIC.
>
> This targets uq/master, correct? Then you should CC qemu-devel on the
> next
Hi Jörg,
On 07.10.2011, at 23:10, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got this backtrace:
>
> [130902.709711] [ cut here ]
> [130902.709747] kernel BUG at include/linux/kvm_host.h:603!
Ouch. This means that preemption is broken in KVM for PPC. To quickly get
things worki
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 10/06/2011 10:40 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > However, it looks like locked xadd is also has better performance: on
> > my Sandybridge laptop (2 cores, 4 threads), the add+mfence is 20% slower
> > than locked xadd, so that pretty much settles it unless yo
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Ok, fair enough. I've revised the patches and attached the main one
> below; please tell me if it looks ok, and then I'll resubmit the
> entire patch set.
Ping ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body o
52 matches
Mail list logo
