On 03/31/2012 11:12 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> This is what I wanted to read before starting GET_DIRTY_LOG work: about
> possible race between VCPU threads and GET_DIRTY_LOG thread.
>
> Although most things look trivial, there seem to be some interesting
> assumptions
> the correctness is bas
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42779
--- Comment #21 from madenginee...@gmail.com 2012-03-31 20:10:38 ---
Sorry for the delay, I've been really busy lately. Is this kernel reasonably
safe to run on my main machine? I'm not worried about it crashing, but if it
takes a filesystem w
Hello all,
I have noticed that the virtio-net drivers for win2k exist in the 3
years' old:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/kvm/files/kvm-driver-disc/20081229/NETKVM-20081229.iso/download
but not in the newest:
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/virtio-win/latest/images/bin/virtio-win-0.1-22
This is what I wanted to read before starting GET_DIRTY_LOG work: about
possible race between VCPU threads and GET_DIRTY_LOG thread.
Although most things look trivial, there seem to be some interesting assumptions
the correctness is based on including mmu lock usage.
Takuya
===
About MMU
On 03/30/2012 05:18 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 03/29/2012 08:57 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 03/29/2012 01:40 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> * Implementation
> We can freely walk the page between walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin and
> walk_shadow_page_lockless_end, it can ensure all
Thank you very much, this solved my problem, not even 1 ping is lost!
I did not find this hint in the documentation though.
Really thanks again
Riccardo
On 3/30/12 11:58 PM, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Riccardo Veraldi"
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Friday, Marc
ifdown and ifup of the bridge is sufficient to enable the new delay config ?
thank you
Rick
On 3/30/12 11:58 PM, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Riccardo Veraldi"
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 5:45:47 PM
Subject: live migration problems.
He
On 03/29/2012 05:27 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> +static bool
> +FNAME(fast_pf_fetch_indirect_spte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
> +u64 *new_spte, gfn_t gfn,
> +u32 expect_access, u64 spte)
> +
> +{
> + struct kvm_mmu_page *
Hi, Stefan
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Asias He wrote:
>> Benchmark shows small performance improvement on fusion io device.
>>
>> Before:
>> seq-read : io=1,024MB, bw=19,982KB/s, iops=39,964, runt= 52475msec
>> seq-write: io=1,024
On 2012-03-30 21:18, Jason Baron wrote:
> diff --git a/hw/device-assignment.c b/hw/device-assignment.c
> index 89823f1..31aed17 100644
> --- a/hw/device-assignment.c
> +++ b/hw/device-assignment.c
> @@ -1609,10 +1609,32 @@ static void reset_assigned_device(DeviceState *dev)
> {
> PCIDevice *p
* Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Care to back that up with numbers and proper trace evidence
> > instead of handwaving?
>
> E.g. my plumbers presentations on lock and mm scalability from
> last year has some graphs that show this very clearly, plus
> some additional data on the mutexes. This compares
11 matches
Mail list logo
