This sounds similar to what Kemari was looking to achieve:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/FaultTolerance
But unfortunately, I believe Kemari development has halted.
-Original Message-
From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
Valentin Zagura
Sent: Sa
On 11 May 2013 17:26, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> I just think that saying "EINVAL: Invalid argument" for a perfectly
> valid argument which is just not supported on this hardware is what's
> wrong, I think ENXIO or ENODEV or whatever is more appropriate of
> this.
That's fine with me. I don't mind
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 11 May 2013 01:38, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:36:52PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> Here's what the documentation says:
>>>
>>> 4.77 KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT
>>>
>>> Capability: basic
>>> Architectures: arm, arm64
>>
Hello:
> Has anyone been able to limit traffic separately to individual VMs?
I just figured out libvirt has bandwidth controls in the guest machine's
configuration. I tried it and it worked. Looking at the qdisc ls report,
it apparently uses tc to achieve the limiting so I am not sure why my
ma
Am 11.05.2013 um 12:24 schrieb Bhushan Bharat-R65777 :
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
>> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:14 PM
>> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
>> Cc: kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
>> tiejun.c...@win
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:14 PM
> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> Cc: kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
> tiejun.c...@windriver.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Add userspace debug stub
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 01:36:30AM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:33:03PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:28:00PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > On 02/05/13 17:09, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > BTW, on arch/arm it looks like this is used
On 11 May 2013 01:38, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:36:52PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Here's what the documentation says:
>>
>> 4.77 KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT
>>
>> Capability: basic
>> Architectures: arm, arm64
>> Type: vcpu ioctl
>> Parameters: struct struct kvm_vcpu_init (in
On 11 May 2013 01:36, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> That all being said, we can remove the check. I don't think, however,
> that it being an unlikely thing is a good argument: if we remove the
> check we need to make sure that the VM does whatever the architecture
> dictates, which I assume is to not
