> > Depending on guest behavior it could look like things are working
> > even though they aren't (e.g. a guest just enables MSR[VEC] and uses
> > altivec instructions, not relying on exceptions). This really isn't
> > worth spending a lot of time debating... Once Altivec is fixed
> > properly (y
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:15:35PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 30/05/2013 15:35, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:23:35PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 30/05/2013 15:10, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> >>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 02:58:09PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
On 2013-05-30 19:58, 李春奇 wrote:
> Hi there,
> I'm now reading codes of kvm-unit-tests and I found that some of the
> test cases for x86 is only designed for x86_64 (including access.flat,
> apic.flat, emulator.flat, idt_test.flat and so on). I wonder why these
> cases are not designed for i386? Or
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:53:09PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> There were discussions on potentially introducing a middle component
> to generate the tables. Coreboot was raised as a possibility, and
> David thought it would be okay to use coreboot for both OVMF and
> SeaBIOS. The possibility
On 5/28/2013 9:27 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
Add a module option to vfio_iommu_type1 to disable IOMMU hugepage
support. This causes iommu_map to only be called with single page
mappings, disabling the IOMMU driver's ability to use hugepages.
This option can be enabled by loading vfio_iommu_type1
On May 30, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 30/05/2013 20:35, Sanjay Lal ha scritto:
>> +#endif
>> +local_irq_save(flags);
>> +if (kvm_mips_handle_vz_root_tlb_fault(badvaddr, vcpu) <
>> 0) {
>> +run->exit_reas
The current kvm_mmu_zap_all is really slow - it is holding mmu-lock to
walk and zap all shadow pages one by one, also it need to zap all guest
page's rmap and all shadow page's parent spte list. Particularly, things
become worse if guest uses more memory or vcpus. It is not good for
scalability
In
From: Gleb Natapov
Quote Gleb's mail:
| why don't we check for sp->role.invalid in
| kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page before calling kvm_reload_remote_mmus()?
and
| Actually we can add check for is_obsolete_sp() there too since
| kvm_mmu_invalidate_all_pages() already calls kvm_reload_remote_mmus()
| a
kvm_zap_obsolete_pages uses lock-break technique to zap pages,
it will flush tlb every time when it does lock-break
We can reload mmu on all vcpus after updating the generation
number so that the obsolete pages are not used on any vcpus,
after that we do not need to flush tlb when obsolete pages
a
Zap at lease 10 pages before releasing mmu-lock to reduce the overload
caused by requiring lock
After the patch, kvm_zap_obsolete_pages can forward progress anyway,
so update the comments
[ It improves the case 0.6% ~ 1% that do kernel building meanwhile read
PCI ROM. ]
Note: i am not sure tha
Quote Gleb's mail:
| Back then kvm->lock protected memslot access so code like:
|
| mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
| kvm_mmu_zap_all(vcpu->kvm);
| mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
|
| which is what 7aa81cc0 does was enough to guaranty that no vcpu will
| run while code is patched. This is no longer
It is good for debug and development
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |1 +
arch/x86/kvm/mmutrace.h | 20
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index c8063b9..3fd060a 100644
---
Replace kvm_mmu_zap_all by kvm_mmu_invalidate_zap_all_pages
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 15 ---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |4 ++--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index d71bf8f..c8063b9
Hi Gleb, Paolo, Marcelo,
I have putted the potential controversial patches to the latter that are
patch 8 ~ 10, patch 11 depends on patch 9. Other patches are fully reviewed,
I think its are ready for being merged. If not luck enough, further discussion
is needed, could you please apply that patch
The obsolete page will be zapped soon, do not reuse it to
reduce future page fault
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 3fd060a..0880b9b4 100644
--- a/arch/x86
It is the responsibility of kvm_mmu_zap_all that keeps the
consistent of mmu and tlbs. And it is also unnecessary after
zap all mmio sptes since no mmio spte exists on root shadow
page and it can not be cached into tlb
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |5 +
1 files ch
As Marcelo pointed out that
| "(retention of large number of pages while zapping)
| can be fatal, it can lead to OOM and host crash"
We introduce a list, kvm->arch.zapped_obsolete_pages, to link all
the pages which are deleted from the mmu cache but not actually
freed. When page reclaiming is need
Show sp->mmu_valid_gen
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmutrace.h | 22 --
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmutrace.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmutrace.h
index b8f6172..697f466 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmutrace.h
+++ b/arc
On 05/10/2013 02:15:34 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 05/10/2013 02:06:53 PM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:
> > > I didn't see Tiejun's patch... My goal was just to fix the
build
> > break
> > > without exposing problems, and to encourage a patch to fix it
> > properly
> > > to happen sooner
On Thu, 30 May 2013, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> Here is the branch with pvpspinlock V9 version in github reabsed to 3.10-rc
>
> https://github.com/ktraghavendra/linux/tree/pvspinlock_v9
>
> planning post a formal email in a separate thread with link a to this
> branch (instead of spamming with 19
Il 30/05/2013 20:35, Sanjay Lal ha scritto:
>>> >> +#endif
>>> >> +local_irq_save(flags);
>>> >> +if (kvm_mips_handle_vz_root_tlb_fault(badvaddr, vcpu) <
>>> >> 0) {
>>> >> +run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>>> >> +
PCIe ACS (Access Control Services) is the PCIe 2.0+ feature that
allows us to control whether transactions are allowed to be redirected
in various subnodes of a PCIe topology. For instance, if two
endpoints are below a root port or downsteam switch port, the
downstream port may optionally redirect
On May 28, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 19/05/2013 07:47, Sanjay Lal ha scritto:
>> +#endif
>> +local_irq_save(flags);
>> +if (kvm_mips_handle_vz_root_tlb_fault(badvaddr, vcpu) < 0) {
>> +run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>> +
On 05/30/2013 10:51 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 30/05/2013 19:07, David Daney ha scritto:
On 05/28/2013 09:34 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 19/05/2013 07:47, Sanjay Lal ha scritto:
- Add API to allow clients (QEMU etc.) to check whether the H/W
supports the MIPS VZ-ASE.
Why does this matte
On May 28, 2013, at 8:04 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 19/05/2013 07:47, Sanjay Lal ha scritto:
>> +static int kvm_vz_ioctl_set_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs
>> *regs)
>> +{
>> +struct mips_coproc *cop0 = vcpu->arch.cop0;
>> +
>> +/* some registers are not restored
>> +
On May 30, 2013, at 10:07 AM, David Daney wrote:
> On 05/28/2013 09:34 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 19/05/2013 07:47, Sanjay Lal ha scritto:
>>> - Add API to allow clients (QEMU etc.) to check whether the H/W
>>> supports the MIPS VZ-ASE.
>>
>> Why does this matter to userspace? Do the user
Il 30/05/2013 19:07, David Daney ha scritto:
> On 05/28/2013 09:34 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 19/05/2013 07:47, Sanjay Lal ha scritto:
>>> - Add API to allow clients (QEMU etc.) to check whether the H/W
>>>supports the MIPS VZ-ASE.
>>
>> Why does this matter to userspace? Do the userspace
This patch includes two fixes for SB:
* the 3rd fixed counter ("ref cpu cycles") can sometimes report
less than the number of iterations
* there is an 8th counter which causes out of bounds accesses
to gp_event or check_counters_many's cnt array
There is still a bug in KVM, because the "pmu
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:57:10AM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > On 05/30/13 18:20, Jordan Justen wrote:
> >> I think ACPI table generation lives in firmware on real products,
> >> because on real products the firmware is the point that best
Il 30/05/2013 19:43, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> @@ -395,6 +396,14 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
> printf("Fixed counters: %d\n", edx.split.num_counters_fixed);
> printf("Fixed counter width: %d\n", edx.split.bit_width_fixed);
>
> + num_counters = eax.split.num_counters;
> +
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:20:42AM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:19 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 13:13 +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> Where is CorebootPkg available from?
> >
> > https://github.com/pgeorgi/edk2/tree/coreboot-pkg
>
> Is the licens
This patch includes two fixes for SB:
* the 3rd fixed counter ("ref cpu cycles") can sometimes report
less than the number of iterations
* there is an 8th counter which causes out of bounds accesses
to gp_event or check_counters_many's cnt array
There is still a bug in KVM, because the "pmu
This patch includes two fixes for SB:
* the 3rd fixed counter ("ref cpu cycles") can sometimes report
less than the number of iterations
* there is an 8th counter which causes out of bounds accesses
to gp_event or check_counters_many's cnt array
There is still a bug in KVM, because the "pmu
On 05/30/13 18:57, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 05/30/13 18:20, Jordan Justen wrote:
>>> I think ACPI table generation lives in firmware on real products,
>>> because on real products the firmware is the point that best
>>> understands the actua
On Fri, 31 May 2013 01:24:43 +0900
Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 03:53:38 +0300
> Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:19:41PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > > On 05/29/2013 08:39 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:03:19AM +0800, Xiao
On 05/28/2013 09:34 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 19/05/2013 07:47, Sanjay Lal ha scritto:
- Add API to allow clients (QEMU etc.) to check whether the H/W
supports the MIPS VZ-ASE.
Why does this matter to userspace? Do the userspace have some way to
detect if the kernel is unmodified or mini
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 05/30/13 18:20, Jordan Justen wrote:
>> I think ACPI table generation lives in firmware on real products,
>> because on real products the firmware is the point that best
>> understands the actual hardware layout for the machine. In qemu, I
On 05/30/13 18:20, Jordan Justen wrote:
> I think ACPI table generation lives in firmware on real products,
> because on real products the firmware is the point that best
> understands the actual hardware layout for the machine. In qemu, I
> would say that qemu best knows the hardware layout, give
Il 30/05/2013 17:34, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> Il 30/05/2013 16:35, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>> The x86-64 extended low-byte registers were fetched correctly from reg,
>> but not from mod/rm.
>>
>> This fixes another bug in the boot of RHEL5.9 64-bit, but it is still
>> not enough.
>
> Well, it
On Thu, 30 May 2013 03:53:38 +0300
Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:19:41PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > On 05/29/2013 08:39 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:03:19AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > > the pages since other vcpus may be doing lock
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:19 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 13:13 +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Where is CorebootPkg available from?
>
> https://github.com/pgeorgi/edk2/tree/coreboot-pkg
Is the license on this actually BSD as the License.txt indicates?
Is this planned to be u
This lets debugging work better during emulation of invalid
guest state.
The check is done before emulating the instruction, and (in the case
of guest debugging) reuses EMULATE_DO_MMIO to exit with KVM_EXIT_DEBUG.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +-
arch/x8
This lets debugging work better during emulation of invalid
guest state.
This time the check is done after emulation, but before writeback
of the flags; we need to check the flags *before* execution of the
instruction, we cannot check singlestep_rip because the CS base may
have already been modifi
The switch to emulate_invalid_guest_state brought one slightly unwelcome
change; the debugging interface does not work in the initial boot phase
because KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG is basically ignored.
These two patches bring some initial support for debugging, namely for
hardware breakpoints and single-
Il 30/05/2013 16:35, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> The x86-64 extended low-byte registers were fetched correctly from reg,
> but not from mod/rm.
>
> This fixes another bug in the boot of RHEL5.9 64-bit, but it is still
> not enough.
Well, it is enough but it takes 2 minutes to reach the point wher
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 07:20:23AM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> > Il 30/05/2013 03:39, Christoffer Dall ha scritto:
> > > The following changes since commit
> > e47a5f5fb715b90b40747e9e235de557c6abd56c:
> > >
> > > KVM: x86 emulator
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:40:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell
>> > wrote:
>> >> Anthony Liguori writes:
>> >>> Rusty Russell writes:
>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM
The x86-64 extended low-byte registers were fetched correctly from reg,
but not from mod/rm.
This fixes another bug in the boot of RHEL5.9 64-bit, but it is still
not enough.
Cc: gnata...@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: # 3.9
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 5 +
Il 30/05/2013 15:35, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:23:35PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 30/05/2013 15:10, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
>>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 02:58:09PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 30/05/2013 14:34, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
>
> A
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:53:45AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Rusty Russell writes:
>
> > Anthony Liguori writes:
> >> Forcing a guest driver change is a really big
> >> deal and I see no reason to do that unless there's a compelling reason
> >> to.
> >>
> >> So we're stuck with the 1.0 con
Rusty Russell writes:
> Anthony Liguori writes:
>> Forcing a guest driver change is a really big
>> deal and I see no reason to do that unless there's a compelling reason
>> to.
>>
>> So we're stuck with the 1.0 config layout for a very long time.
>
> We definitely must not force a guest change.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:40:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
>
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell
> > wrote:
> >> Anthony Liguori writes:
> >>> Rusty Russell writes:
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > F
Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Anthony Liguori writes:
>>> Rusty Russell writes:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> FWIW, I think what's more interesting is using vhost-net as a networking
> backen
Rusty Russell writes:
> Anthony Liguori writes:
>> Rusty Russell writes:
>>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
FWIW, I think what's more interesting is using vhost-net as a networking
backend with virtio-net in QEMU being what's guest facing.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:23:35PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 30/05/2013 15:10, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 02:58:09PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 30/05/2013 14:34, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> >>>
> >>> Ah, we check kvm_apic_has_events() in runnable. Th
Il 30/05/2013 15:10, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 02:58:09PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 30/05/2013 14:34, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Ah, we check kvm_apic_has_events() in runnable. Then yes, we will not
>>> lose the event.
>
> Ok, then I'd pref
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 02:58:09PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 30/05/2013 14:34, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Ah, we check kvm_apic_has_events() in runnable. Then yes, we will not
> >>> > > lose the event.
> >> >
> >> > Ok, then I'd prefer to have the cmpxchg directly in the i
hello,
I can boot on lsi scsi with qemu 1.4 with
-device scsi-hd -drive file=/dev/
but not
-device scsi-block -drive file=/dev/
- Mail original -
De: "Daniel Guillermo Bareiro"
À: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 29 Mai 2013 13:11:42
Objet: Re: Unable to boot from SCSI disk
Il 30/05/2013 14:34, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
>>> > >
>>> > > Ah, we check kvm_apic_has_events() in runnable. Then yes, we will not
>>> > > lose the event.
>> >
>> > Ok, then I'd prefer to have the cmpxchg directly in the if, as in
>> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/11050
On 05/30/13 14:19, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Yeah, but if we're shoving a lot of hardware-specific ACPI table
> generation into the guest's firmware, instead of just doing it on the
> qemu side where a number of us seem to think it belongs, then there *is*
> a benefit to using Coreboot. When stuff
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:30:41AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 30/05/2013 09:09, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:31:11AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 30/05/2013 08:01, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> >>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 07:41:05AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:19:18PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Yeah, but if we're shoving a lot of hardware-specific ACPI table
> generation into the guest's firmware, instead of just doing it on the
> qemu side where a number of us seem to think it belongs,
Hopefully this is not yet set in st
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 13:13 +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Where is CorebootPkg available from?
https://github.com/pgeorgi/edk2/tree/coreboot-pkg
> > And it helps to dispel the stupid misconception in some quarters that
> > Coreboot *competes* with UEFI and thus cannot possibly be supported
> > bec
On 04/23/2013 07:12 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
On 04/23/2013 01:19 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 08:52 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
On 04/22/2013 07:51 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 17:12 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
If we always incremented the ticket number
This is encountered when booting RHEL5.9 64-bit. There is another bug
after this one that is not a simple emulation failure, but this one lets
the boot proceed a bit.
Cc: # 3.9
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
dif
On 05/30/13 11:23, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 11:18 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> Certainly an option, but that is a long-term project.
>>
>> Out of curiousity, are there other benefits to using coreboot as a core
>> firmware in QEMU?
>>
>> Is there a payload we would eve
Hi there,
I'm now reading codes of kvm-unit-tests and I found that some of the
test cases for x86 is only designed for x86_64 (including access.flat,
apic.flat, emulator.flat, idt_test.flat and so on). I wonder why these
cases are not designed for i386? Or is there any other concerns?
Thanks,
Arth
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 11:18 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> > Certainly an option, but that is a long-term project.
>
> Out of curiousity, are there other benefits to using coreboot as a core
> firmware in QEMU?
>
> Is there a payload we would ever plausibly use besides OVMF and SeaBIOS?
I li
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:28:26PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> Yet the structure definitions are descriptive, capturing layout, size
> >> and endianness in natural a format readable by any C programmer.
> >
> >>From an API design point of view, here are the problems I see:
> >
> > 1) C makes n
Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> On the receive side, what can we do better than readv? If we need to
>> return to userspace to tell the guest that we've got a new packet, we
>> don't win on latency. We might reduce syscall overhead with a
>> mu
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:41:09PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 29/05/2013 15:24, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > You expect a compiler to pad this structure:
> >
> > struct foo {
> > uint8_t a;
> > uint8_t b;
> > uint16_t c;
> > uint32_t d;
> > };
> >
> > I'm guessing any
Il 30/05/2013 09:09, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:31:11AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 30/05/2013 08:01, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
>>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 07:41:05AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 30/05/2013 03:20, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> On Tue, May 28,
On Thu, May 30 2013, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Jens Axboe writes:
> > On Wed, Feb 27 2013, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> Aurelien Jarno writes:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I have noticed that virtio-rng only returns zero for kernels >= 2.6.33
> >> > built with CONFIG_HW_RANDOM=m. This is a bit much too pre
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:31:11AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 30/05/2013 08:01, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 07:41:05AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 30/05/2013 03:20, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> >>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 06:33:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
74 matches
Mail list logo
