On 06/02/2013 02:02 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 06/01/2013 12:21 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
x86/spinlock: Replace pv spinlocks with pv ticketlocks
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge jeremy.fitzhardi...@citrix.com
I'm not sure what the etiquette is here; I did the work while at Citrix,
but
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 12:51:25AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism
with a paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism. The series provides
implementation for both Xen and KVM.
High level question here. We have a big hope for
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 01:45:55PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 05/31/13 09:09, Jordan Justen wrote:
Why is updating the ACPI tables in seabios viewed as such a burden?
Either qemu does it, or seabios... (And, OVMF too, but I don't think
you guys are concerned with that. :)
I am :)
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:34:26PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:53:09PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
There were discussions on potentially introducing a middle component
to generate the tables. Coreboot was raised as a possibility, and
David thought it would be
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:48:10AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 31/05/2013 11:18, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:48:32AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 31/05/2013 06:36, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
In my commit message there is two INITs in a row:
vpu0:
Il 02/06/2013 15:14, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
Can you show what is the case in my patch where you have coalescing? I
You'ev said it in some of your emails. Quoting:
INIT-INIT-SIPI-INIT-SIPI
your version would do many SIPIs, while mine would do just one.
Cancelling is very different
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:45:44AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:53:09PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 03:41:32PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Juan is not available now, and Anthony asked for
agenda to be sent early.
So here
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 06:05:42PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:45:44AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:53:09PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 03:41:32PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Juan is not available now,
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:58:07PM +0800, 李春奇 Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
Hi there,
I'm now reading codes of kvm-unit-tests and I found that some of the
test cases for x86 is only designed for x86_64 (including access.flat,
apic.flat, emulator.flat, idt_test.flat and so on). I wonder why these
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 07:43:07PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
This patch includes two fixes for SB:
* the 3rd fixed counter (ref cpu cycles) can sometimes report
less than the number of iterations
Is it documented? It is strange for architectural counter to behave
differently on
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 07:47:18PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
This patch includes two fixes for SB:
* the 3rd fixed counter (ref cpu cycles) can sometimes report
less than the number of iterations
* there is an 8th counter which causes out of bounds accesses
to gp_event or
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 06:09:50PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 06:05:42PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:45:44AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:53:09PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 06:40:43PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 06:09:50PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 06:05:42PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:45:44AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
High level question here. We have a big hope for Preemptable Ticket
Spinlock patch series by Jiannan Ouyang to solve most, if not all,
ticketing spinlocks in overcommit scenarios problem without need for PV.
So how this patch
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 04:32:25PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
So what I didn't like from the start about
pending_events is that it introduces two locked instruction on each
interrupt injection path, your patch makes it worse by change one of
those locked instruction to cmpxchg, while mine
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 04:52:18PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Luiz Capitulino reported that guest refused to boot and qemu
complained with:
kvm_set_phys_mem: error unregistering overlapping slot: Invalid argument
It is caused by commit 235e8982ad that did double free for the memslot
so
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:35:55PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The x86-64 extended low-byte registers were fetched correctly from reg,
but not from mod/rm.
This fixes another bug in the boot of RHEL5.9 64-bit, but it is still
not enough.
Did I missed unit test patch? :)
Cc:
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Xiao Guangrong
xiaoguangr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Luiz Capitulino reported that guest refused to boot and qemu
complained with:
kvm_set_phys_mem: error unregistering overlapping slot: Invalid argument
On 06/02/2013 09:50 PM, Jiannan Ouyang wrote:
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
High level question here. We have a big hope for Preemptable Ticket
Spinlock patch series by Jiannan Ouyang to solve most, if not all,
ticketing spinlocks in overcommit scenarios
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:53:45AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au writes:
Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com writes:
Forcing a guest driver change is a really big
deal and I see no reason to do that unless
Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com writes:
1. s/These are devices are/These devices are
2. s/Thefirst/The first
3. s/, Guest should/. Guest should
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com
---
virtio-spec.lyx | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:28:26PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Yet the structure definitions are descriptive, capturing layout, size
and endianness in natural a format readable by any C programmer.
From an API design point of view, here are the
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:40:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au
wrote:
Anthony
On 06/01/13 01:01, Jordan Justen wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I guess -bios would load coreboot. Coreboot would siphon the data
necessary for ACPI table building through the current (same) fw_cfg
bottleneck, build the tables,
Yes.
24 matches
Mail list logo
