https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60679
Jay Ren changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60679
Jay Ren changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60679
Jay Ren changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Wenchao Xia wrote:
> 于 2013-8-12 19:33, Stefan Hajnoczi 写道:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Alex Bligh wrote:
>>>
>>> --On 12 August 2013 11:59:03 +0200 Stefan Hajnoczi
>>> wrote:
>>>
The idea that was discussed on qemu-de...@nongnu.org uses fork(2) t
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:17:51PM +0800, Timon Wang wrote:
> Yes, SCSI bus likes pass through a shared LUN to the vm, and I am
> using a shared LUN for 'share' purpose.
>
> I found a post that vmware use lsilogic bus for the shared disk, but
> my qemu/kvm version can't support lsilogic bus.
>
>
Now that cpu_in/out is just a wrapper around address_space_rw, we can
also call the latter directly. As host endianness == guest endianness,
there is no need for the memory access helpers st*_p/ld*_p as well.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
---
kvm-all.c | 28 ++--
1 files ch
Am 13.08.2013 14:43, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> Now that cpu_in/out is just a wrapper around address_space_rw, we can
> also call the latter directly. As host endianness == guest endianness,
> there is no need for the memory access helpers st*_p/ld*_p as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
> ---
> kv
Hi,
for a uni project I'm trying to write a userspace for KVM that can run
ELF binaries without a full blown OS in the guest. The idea is to handle
any syscalls made by the binary running inside the guest in the
userspace of the host. In the simplest case you could forward them to
the host Linux k
Il 13/08/2013 16:33, Florian Pester ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> for a uni project I'm trying to write a userspace for KVM that can run
> ELF binaries without a full blown OS in the guest. The idea is to handle
> any syscalls made by the binary running inside the guest in the
> userspace of the host. In
Add a series of test cases for nested VMX in kvm-unit-tests.
Arthur Chunqi Li (4):
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for PAT and EFER
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for CR0/4 shadowing
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for I/O bitmaps
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for instru
Add test cases for I/O bitmaps, including corner cases.
Signed-off-by: Arthur Chunqi Li
---
x86/vmx.h |6 +-
x86/vmx_tests.c | 167 +++
2 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/x86/vmx.h b/x86/vmx.h
index 1896
Add test cases for ENT_LOAD_PAT, ENT_LOAD_EFER, EXI_LOAD_PAT,
EXI_SAVE_PAT, EXI_LOAD_EFER, EXI_SAVE_PAT flags in enter/exit
control fields.
Signed-off-by: Arthur Chunqi Li
---
x86/vmx.h |7 +++
x86/vmx_tests.c | 185 +++
2 files chan
Add testing for CR0/4 shadowing.
Signed-off-by: Arthur Chunqi Li
---
lib/x86/vm.h|4 +
x86/vmx_tests.c | 218 +++
2 files changed, 222 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/x86/vm.h b/lib/x86/vm.h
index eff6f72..6e0ce2b 100644
--- a/lib/x86/
Add test cases for instruction interception, including three types:
1. Primary Processor-Based VM-Execution Controls (HLT/INVLPG/MWAIT/
RDPMC/RDTSC/MONITOR/PAUSE)
2. Secondary Processor-Based VM-Execution Controls (WBINVD)
3. No control flag (CPUID/INVD)
Signed-off-by: Arthur Chunqi Li
---
x86/v
Raghavendra...
Even with this latest patch this branch is broken:
:(.discard+0x6108): multiple definition of `__pcpu_unique_lock_waiting'
arch/x86/xen/built-in.o:(.discard+0x23): first defined here
CC drivers/firmware/google/gsmi.o
arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o:(.discard+0x6108): multiple def
* H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Raghavendra...
>
> Even with this latest patch this branch is broken:
>
> :(.discard+0x6108): multiple definition of `__pcpu_unique_lock_waiting'
> arch/x86/xen/built-in.o:(.discard+0x23): first defined here
> CC drivers/firmware/google/gsmi.o
> arch/x86/kernel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60518
Bart Van Assche changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60505
Bart Van Assche changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
* Ingo Molnar [2013-08-13 18:55:52]:
> Would be nice to have a delta fix patch against tip:x86/spinlocks, which
> I'll then backmerge into that series via rebasing it.
>
There was a namespace collision of PER_CPU lock_waiting variable when
we have both Xen and KVM enabled.
Perhaps this week
On 08/13/2013 01:02 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar [2013-08-13 18:55:52]:
>
>> Would be nice to have a delta fix patch against tip:x86/spinlocks, which
>> I'll then backmerge into that series via rebasing it.
>>
> There was a namespace collision of PER_CPU lock_waiting variable when
>
On 08/14/2013 01:30 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 08/13/2013 01:02 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
[...]
Ingo, below delta patch should fix it, IIRC, I hope you will be folding this
back to patch 14/14 itself. Else please let me.
it was.. s/Please let me know/
[...]
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(st
Hi All,
I'm working with some disk introspection on KVM, and we trying to create
a shadow image of the disk. We've hooked the functions in block.c, in
particular bdrv_aio_writev. However we are seeing writes go through,
pausing the VM, and the comparing our shadow image with the actual VM
imag
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 14:44 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> This is to reserve a capablity number for upcoming support
> of H_PUT_TCE_INDIRECT and H_STUFF_TCE pseries hypercalls
> which support mulptiple DMA map/unmap operations per one call.
Gleb, any chance you can put this (and the next on
于 2013-8-13 16:21, Stefan Hajnoczi 写道:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Wenchao Xia wrote:
于 2013-8-12 19:33, Stefan Hajnoczi 写道:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Alex Bligh wrote:
--On 12 August 2013 11:59:03 +0200 Stefan Hajnoczi
wrote:
The idea that was discussed on qemu-de...@nongn
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Alex Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 13:26 +0800, Kai Huang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In case of direct io, without the interrupt remapping in IOMMU (intel
>> VT-d or AMD IOMMU), hypervisor needs to inject interrupt for guest
>> when the guest is scheduled to s
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Alex Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 13:26 +0800, Kai Huang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In case of direct io, without the interrupt remapping in IOMMU (intel
>> VT-d or AMD IOMMU), hypervisor needs to inject interrupt for guest
>> when the guest is scheduled to s
On Tue, 08/13 16:13, Spensky, Chad - 0559 - MITLL wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm working with some disk introspection on KVM, and we trying to create
> a shadow image of the disk. We've hooked the functions in block.c, in
> particular bdrv_aio_writev. However we are seeing writes go through,
> pausi
Hi people,
I'm needing a great help but I don't know if this list is a best place
for this, I'll describe my problem for all.
I have a server in a Data Center, this host has 5 KVM VM's, and it has
only on NIC, I could have many IP addre on this NIC, but I don't
know how to specifies an p
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 10:37 +0800, Liu ping fan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Alex Williamson
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 13:26 +0800, Kai Huang wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> In case of direct io, without the interrupt remapping in IOMMU (intel
> >> VT-d or AMD IOMMU), hypervisor ne
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Alex Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 10:37 +0800, Liu ping fan wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Alex Williamson
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 13:26 +0800, Kai Huang wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> In case of direct io, without the interrup
Stimate utilizator
Adresa ta de e-mail a depa?it 2 GB, care este creat de webmaster-ul nostru, se
executa în prezent la 2.30GB, nu pute?i trimite sau primi mesaje noi pâna când
va verifica?i contul. Completa?i formularul pentru a confirma contul tau.
Completa?i formularul de mai jos pentru a con
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Targino SIlveira
wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> I'm needing a great help but I don't know if this list is a best place for
> this, I'll describe my problem for all.
>
> I have a server in a Data Center, this host has 5 KVM VM's, and it has only
> on NIC, I could have man
Thanks, i have tried virtio-scsi and LSI SCSI controller, by using a
local file or a LUN as disk. Both raw and qcow2 disk format are be
verified, but no way to make windows Failover Cluster and Oracle RAC
work correctly.
Actually, Oracle RAC and Windows Failover Cluster needs "share"
storage like
33 matches
Mail list logo
