On 2013-09-26 22:44, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 26/09/2013 19:47, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
If I only apply this hunk, which disables the preemption timer while
in L1:
@@ -8396,6 +8375,8 @@ static void nested_vmx_vmexit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
load_vmcs12_host_state(vcpu, vmcs12);
+
On 24/09/2013 16:09, Juan Quintela wrote:
Hi
Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
Last week I forgot to send the call for topics. We still have a topic there.
Thanks, Juan.
Agenda so far:
- Talk about qemu reverse executing (1st description was done this week)
How
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 03:19:28AM +0530, Piyus Kedia wrote:
I am working on record replay in KVM. I just want to confirm that KVM
doesn't access guest memory except for DMA. The functions
kvm_read_guest_page() and kvm_write_guest_page() in kvm_main.c are
only used for mmio emulation which
Thanks.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 03:19:28AM +0530, Piyus Kedia wrote:
I am working on record replay in KVM. I just want to confirm that KVM
doesn't access guest memory except for DMA. The functions
kvm_read_guest_page()
I'm sorry for replying this mail for so long.
I named the 'Cross-Platform KVM' fvm ('f'is the beginning of my name
:)).
The kernel module is based on kvm-kmod 3.4, and the qemu (version 1.1~1.6) can
be patched easily for fvm.
I named the kernel module vmmr0 (VMM in Ring0).
Not
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Missing patch description.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
I fail to see how this really simplifies things, but at the end of the day it's
Gleb's and
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Missing patch description.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
I fail to see how this really simplifies things, but at
On 09/26/2013 12:01 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
+int powernv_hwrng_present(void)
+{
+ return __raw_get_cpu_var(powernv_rng) != NULL;
+}
+
static unsigned long rng_whiten(struct powernv_rng *rng, unsigned long val)
{
unsigned long parity;
@@ -42,6 +48,17 @@ static unsigned long
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:32:06PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 04:20:59PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
Please point me to the code that does this, because I don't see it on
patch 6/6.
@@ -1850,7 +1850,14 @@ static void filter_features_for_kvm(X86CPU *cpu)
Il 27/09/2013 15:13, Aneesh Kumar K.V ha scritto:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Missing patch description.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
I
The ARM V7 and V8 CPUs use the nearly identical support code for generating
timer DT nodes as they both use ARM's architected timers. This code is currently
duplicated for AArch32 and AArch64.
This cleanup patch generalises timer DT node generation to follow the same
pattern as for the GIC. The
These two patches allow KVM-tool to exploit the Cortex-A7 support for KVM
recently posted to the kvmarm mailing list.
The first patch is a standalone cleanup to extract previously duplicated timer
setup code, and allows us to add A7 support in a small subsequent patch.
Note: the removal of the
The Cortex-A7 is very similar to the Cortex-A15 and as such there is very
little extra infrastructure required for KVM tool to be able to create
A7-guests.
This patch adds the basic support and allows booting of A7 guests on A7
hosts. It depends on Cortex-A7 support patches posted recently to the
Dave And Nancy HoneyWell Donation Of £1,500,000.00GBP Contact us for your
charity donation. Email: daveandhoneyw...@live.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
From: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
Since the code in book3s_64_vio_hv.c is called from real mode with HV
KVM, and therefore has to be built into the main kernel binary, this
makes it always built-in rather than part of the KVM module. It gets
called from the KVM module by PR KVM, so this adds
From: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
add kvmppc_free_vcores() to free the kvmppc_vcore structures
that we allocate for a guest, which are currently being leaked.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This help ups to select the relevant code in the kernel code
when we later move HV and PR bits as seperate modules.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_64.h | 6 +++---
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This help us to identify whether we are running with hypervisor mode KVM
enabled. The change is needed so that we can have both HV and PR kvm
enabled in the same kernel.
If both HV and PR KVM are included, interrupts come in to the HV
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 4 ++--
arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c | 4 ++--
arch/mips/kvm/kvm_mips.c | 6 ++
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This moves HV and PR specific functions to kvmppc_ops callback.
This is needed so that we can enable HV and PR together in the
same kernel. Actual changes to enable both come in the later
patch.This also renames almost all of the symbols that
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This moves /dev/kvm ownership to kvm.ko module. Depending on
which KVM mode we select during VM creation we take a reference
count on respective module
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
Hi All,
This patch series support enabling HV and PR KVM together in the same kernel. We
extend machine property with new property kvm_type. A value of 1 will force HV
KVM and 2 PR KVM. The default value is 0 which will select the fastest KVM mode.
ie, HV if that is supported otherwise PR.
With
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This patch moves PR related tracepoints to a separate header. This
enables in converting PR to a kernel module which will be done in
later patches
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/Kconfig | 6 +++---
arch/powerpc/kvm/Makefile | 12
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 19 ++-
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This moves the kvmppc_ops callbacks to be a per VM entity. This
enables us to select HV and PR mode when creating a VM
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++
From: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
This label is not used now.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S | 3 ---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_interrupts.S| 3 ---
2 files changed,
Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
Hi All,
This patch series support enabling HV and PR KVM together in the same kernel.
We
extend machine property with new property kvm_type. A value of 1 will force
HV
KVM and 2 PR KVM. The default value is 0 which will select the
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
add kvmppc_free_vcores() to free the kvmppc_vcore structures
that we allocate for a guest, which are currently being leaked.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This help ups to select the relevant code in the kernel code
when we later move HV and PR bits as seperate modules.
I don't think I grasp what semantically the difference between
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This moves HV and PR specific functions to kvmppc_ops callback.
This is needed so that we can enable HV and PR together in the
same kernel. Actual changes to enable both come in the
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This help us to identify whether we are running with hypervisor mode KVM
enabled. The change is needed so that we can have both HV and PR kvm
enabled in the same kernel.
If both HV
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This patch moves PR related tracepoints to a separate header. This
enables in converting PR to a kernel module which will be done in
later patches
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/Kconfig | 6 +++---
arch/powerpc/kvm/Makefile | 12
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Missing patch description.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
I fail to see how this really simplifies things, but at the end of the day it's
Gleb's and
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This moves HV and PR specific functions to kvmppc_ops callback.
This is needed so that we can enable HV and PR together in the
same kernel. Actual
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
This help us to identify whether we are running with hypervisor mode KVM
enabled. The change is needed so that we can have both HV and PR kvm
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
index fd5b393..775d368 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
+++
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Missing patch description.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
I fail to see how this really simplifies things, but at
On 09/26/2013 12:01 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
+int powernv_hwrng_present(void)
+{
+ return __raw_get_cpu_var(powernv_rng) != NULL;
+}
+
static unsigned long rng_whiten(struct powernv_rng *rng, unsigned long val)
{
unsigned long parity;
@@ -42,6 +48,17 @@ static unsigned long
Il 27/09/2013 15:13, Aneesh Kumar K.V ha scritto:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Missing patch description.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
I
40 matches
Mail list logo
