On 08/12/2014 04:41 AM, Li Liu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is anyone there can tell the current status of vhost-net on kvm-arm?
>
> Half a year has passed from Isa Ansharullah asked this question:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm-arm/msg08152.html
>
> I have found two patches which have provided the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82211
Bug ID: 82211
Summary: [Nested xen on kvm] L1 guest panic and reboot when L1
guest boot up.
Product: Virtualization
Version: unspecified
Kernel Version: 3.16.0
Hardware:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82211
--- Comment #1 from Zhou, Chao ---
the first bad commit is:
commit 6addfc42992be4b073c39137ecfdf4b2aa2d487f
Author: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Thu Mar 27 11:29:28 2014 +0100
KVM: x86: avoid useless set of KVM_REQ_EVENT after emulation
Despit
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 5:30 AM
> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> Cc: ag...@suse.de; kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Yoder Stuart-
> B08248
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7 v3] KVM: PPC: BOOKE: Emulate debug registers and
> except
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82211
--- Comment #2 from Zhou, Chao ---
Created attachment 146291
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=146291&action=edit
L1 serial log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:46:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 21:45:59 +0200
>
> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:30:35AM +0300, Razya Ladelsky wrote:
> ...
> > And, did your tests actually produce 100% load on both host CPUs?
> ...
>
> Michael
LPC IOMMU and VFIO MicroConference - Call for Participation
===
We are pleased to announce that this year there will be the first IOMMU
and VFIO MicroConference held at Linux Plumbers Conference in
Düsseldorf. An initial request for support o
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 05:16:21PM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote:
> On 08/11/2014 12:12 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > Remove the parenthesis from the subject line.
>
I just prefer not having the "(w/no huge PUD support)" part in the patch
title.
> Hmmm have to check this don't see it my patch fi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81841
Joerg Roedel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@8bytes.org
--- Comment #12 from Joerg
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 06:36:14PM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote:
> On 08/11/2014 12:12 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
[...]
> >> +/**
> >> + * stage2_wp_range() - write protect stage2 memory region range
> >> + * @kvm: The KVM pointer
> >> + * @start:Start address of range
> >> + * &end: En
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 06:25:05PM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote:
> On 08/11/2014 12:13 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:56:08PM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote:
> >> This patch adds support for handling 2nd stage page faults during
> >> migration,
> >> it disables faulting in
On 06.08.14 08:38, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan
---
v2->v3
- New patch
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c| 6 ++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
b/arch/powerpc/incl
On 06.08.14 08:38, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
This patchset adds debug register and interrupt emulation
support for guest, which enables running gdb/kgdb etc in guest.
v2->v3
- Added One-reg interface for DBSR
- removed arch->shadow_dbg_reg
- Addressed some more comments on v2 (detail in indiv
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 3:55 PM
> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777; kvm-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Yoder Stuart-B08248
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7 v3] Guest debug emulation
>
>
> On
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81841
--- Comment #13 from Marti Raudsepp ---
(In reply to Joerg Roedel from comment #12)
> Thanks, Joerg
Indeed. Thanks, Joerg. And thanks everyone else too, you have been very
helpful!
I didn't have v3.13 sources handy, but I applied the attachment
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81841
--- Comment #14 from Joerg Roedel ---
Hi Marti,
> Indeed. Thanks, Joerg. And thanks everyone else too, you have been very
> helpful!
>
> I didn't have v3.13 sources handy, but I applied the attachment 146311
> I can start & shut down the VM mul
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 12/08/2014 12:18:50 PM:
> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> To: David Miller
> Cc: Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alex
> Glikson/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, Eran Raichstein/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, Yossi
> Kuperman1/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, Joel Nider/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL,
> a
E-mail Account Warning !!!
This mail is from Administrator; we wish to bring to your notice the Condition
of your email account.
We have just noticed that you have exceeded your email Database limit of 500 MB
quota and your email IP is causing conflict because it is been accessed in
different s
On 12.08.14 07:17, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
On Monday 11 August 2014 02:45 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.08.14 10:51, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 09:26 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
index da86d9b..
On Tuesday 12 August 2014 04:49 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 12.08.14 07:17, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>> On Monday 11 August 2014 02:45 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 11.08.14 10:51, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 09:26 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> diff --g
On 05.08.14 12:39, Mihai Caraman wrote:
Add KVM Book3e AltiVec support. KVM Book3e FPU support gracefully reuse host
infrastructure so follow the same approach for AltiVec.
Keep SPE/AltiVec exception handlers distinct using CONFIG_KVM_E500V2.
Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman
---
v3:
- use disti
On 05.08.14 12:39, Mihai Caraman wrote:
Make ONE_REG AltiVec support common across server and embedded implementations
moving kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_one_reg() and kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_one_reg() functions
to powerpc layer.
Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman
Please split this into 2 separate patches, one
On 05.08.14 12:39, Mihai Caraman wrote:
Add ONE_REG IVORs support, with IVORs 0-15 and 35 booke common.
Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman
---
v3:
- new patch
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 24 +++
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c| 132
arc
On 12.08.14 13:35, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
On Tuesday 12 August 2014 04:49 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 12.08.14 07:17, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
On Monday 11 August 2014 02:45 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.08.14 10:51, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 09:26 +0200, A
On Tuesday 12 August 2014 05:45 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 12.08.14 13:35, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>> On Tuesday 12 August 2014 04:49 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 12.08.14 07:17, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
On Monday 11 August 2014 02:45 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 11.08.14
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81841
--- Comment #15 from Joel Schopp ---
> (In reply to Joel Schopp from comment #10)
> > > AMD would need to confirm it.
> >
> > I don't have an answer for you offhand. Let me do some digging and get you
> > an answer.
>
> I am sorry if I sounded
On 08/11/2014 10:27 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Mon) 11 Aug 2014 [15:11:03], H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 08/11/2014 11:49 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
>>> The khwrngd thread is started when a hwrng device of sufficient
>>> quality is registered. The virtio-rng device is backed by the
>>> hypervisor, and we
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81841
--- Comment #16 from Alex Williamson ---
(In reply to Joel Schopp from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Joel Schopp from comment #10)
> > > > AMD would need to confirm it.
> > >
> > > I don't have an answer for you offhand. Let me do some digging an
The khwrngd thread is started when a hwrng device of sufficient
quality is registered. The virtio-rng device is backed by the
hypervisor, and we trust the hypervisor to provide real entropy.
A malicious hypervisor is a scenario that's irrelevant -- such a setup
is bound to cause all sorts of badn
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81841
--- Comment #17 from Marti Raudsepp ---
It's an ASRock FM2A88X Extreme6+ motherboard with the AMD A88X (Bolton-D4)
chipset.
There are 12 IOMMU groups on the system. The problematic group for me is number
9 because the legacy PCI bridge (14.4) get
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Li Liu wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is anyone there can tell the current status of vhost-net on kvm-arm?
>
> Half a year has passed from Isa Ansharullah asked this question:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm-arm/msg08152.html
>
> I have found two patches which
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:38:23PM -0500, Joel Schopp wrote:
> The current VTTBR_BADDR_MASK only masks 39 bits, which is broken on current
> systems. Rather than just add a bit it seems like a good time to also set
> things at run-time instead of compile time to accomodate more hardware.
>
> This
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 03:17:56AM -0400, Jidong Xiao wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 04/06/2014 03:10, Jidong Xiao ha scritto:
> >
> >> diff --git a/qemu-2.0.0/target-i386/kvm.c.orig
> >> b/qemu-2.0.0/target-i386/kvm.c
> >> index 4389959..b8b282d 100644
> >> -
Il 12/08/2014 20:55, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
> This makes the CPUID data change under the guest's feet during
> live-migration.
>
> Adding compat code to ensure older machine-types keep the old behavior
> is necessary, but in this specific case it is mostly harmless because
> 0x0 is documented
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This introduces and uses a very simple synchronous mechanism to get
> /dev/urandom-style bits appropriate for initial KVM PV guest RNG
> seeding.
>
> It also re-works the way that architectural random data is fed into
> random.c's pools. I
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:11:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> What's the status of this series? I assume that it's too late for at
> least patches 2-5 to make it into 3.17.
Which tree were you hoping this patch series to go through? I was
assuming it would go through the x86 tree since t
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:11:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> What's the status of this series? I assume that it's too late for at
>> least patches 2-5 to make it into 3.17.
>
> Which tree were you hoping this patch series to go th
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:12:00PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 12/08/2014 20:55, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
> > This makes the CPUID data change under the guest's feet during
> > live-migration.
> >
> > Adding compat code to ensure older machine-types keep the old behavior
> > is necessary,
Hello,
I am exploring ideas for clients in cloud to be able to implement functions
where there could verify the services offered by the cloud provider like
metering services.
Idea is I am using the concept of write execute protection scheme. And also I
am using TamperEvident Log. I am making u
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 02:36 -0500, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 5:30 AM
> > To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> > Cc: ag...@suse.de; kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Yoder
> > Stuart-
> > B08248
>
On 08/12/2014 02:36 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 06:36:14PM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote:
>> On 08/11/2014 12:12 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>
> [...]
>
+/**
+ * stage2_wp_range() - write protect stage2 memory region range
+ * @kvm: The KVM pointer
+ *
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Xiao Guangrong
wrote:
> @@ -722,9 +719,10 @@ static struct kvm_memslots *install_new_memslots(struct
> kvm *kvm,
> {
> struct kvm_memslots *old_memslots = kvm->memslots;
>
I think you want
slots->generation = old_memslots->generation;
here.
On the
On 08/12/2014 02:32 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 05:16:21PM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote:
>> On 08/11/2014 12:12 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> Remove the parenthesis from the subject line.
>>
>
> I just prefer not having the "(w/no huge PUD support)" part in the patch
> t
Hi,
>From the Intel processor manual I read that accessed bit has been
introduced in EPT. The Redhat 6 release notes mention that "Extended
Page Table age bits enables a host to make smarter choices for
swapping memory under memory pressure". I couldn't find any related
patches on KVM or LKML. I
On 08/12/2014 02:50 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 06:25:05PM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote:
>> On 08/11/2014 12:13 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:56:08PM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote:
This patch adds support for handling 2nd stage page faults du
On 2014/8/12 15:29, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 08/12/2014 04:41 AM, Li Liu wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is anyone there can tell the current status of vhost-net on kvm-arm?
>>
>> Half a year has passed from Isa Ansharullah asked this question:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm-arm/msg08152.html
>>
>> I
On 2014/8/12 23:47, Nikolay Nikolaev wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Li Liu wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is anyone there can tell the current status of vhost-net on kvm-arm?
>>
>> Half a year has passed from Isa Ansharullah asked this question:
>> http://www.spinics.net/li
Hi Umesh,
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 08:07:48PM -0500, Umesh Deshpande wrote:
>Hi,
>
>>From the Intel processor manual I read that accessed bit has been
>introduced in EPT. The Redhat 6 release notes mention that "Extended
>Page Table age bits enables a host to make smarter choices for
>swapping memor
fc95ca7284bc54953165cba76c3228bd2cdb9591 claims that there is no
functional change but this is not true as it calls get_order() (which
takes bytes) where it should have called ilog2() and the kernel stops
on VM_BUG_ON().
This replaces get_order() with ilog2().
Suggested-by: Paul Mackerras
Cc: Al
49 matches
Mail list logo
