On 2015/3/10 4:54, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 09:41:45PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index f528343..6e52f3f 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -672,6 +672,7 @@ static void
This suggests another fix. We can change the insertion to use a =
comparison, as in your first patch. Alone it is not correct, but we
only need to take some care and avoid breaking the case of deleting a
memslot.
It's enough to wrap the second loop (that you patched) with
if
On 09/03/2015 20:49, Avi Kivity wrote:
Yes, and it checked that MAXPHYADDR != 52 before. If you want to set
only one bit, making that bit 51 makes sense anyway for simplicity, so
it is still 99.9% academic. Once processors appear with MAXPHYADDR =
52, the remaining 0.1% will become more
On 09/03/2015 20:50, Avi Kivity wrote:
Is the issue emulating a higher MAXPHYADDR on the guest than is
available on the host? I don't think there's any need to support that.
No, indeed. The only problem is that the failure mode is quite horrible
(you get a triple fault, possibly while the
2015-03-09 20:28-0300, Marcelo Tosatti:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 06:19:18PM -0600, Joel Schopp wrote:
From: David Kaplan david.kap...@amd.com
No need to re-decode WBINVD since we know what it is from the intercept.
Signed-off-by: David Kaplan david.kap...@amd.com
[extracted from larger
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Bandan Das b...@redhat.com wrote:
Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru writes:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru wrote:
Hello,
recently I`ve got a couple of shiny new
* Andrey Korolyov (and...@xdel.ru) wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Bandan Das b...@redhat.com wrote:
Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru writes:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
dgilb...@redhat.com wrote:
* Andrey Korolyov (and...@xdel.ru) wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Bandan Das b...@redhat.com wrote:
Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru
Dr. David Alan Gilbert dgilb...@redhat.com writes:
* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 10/03/2015 19:21, Bandan Das wrote:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
On 10/03/2015 17:57, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
I'm seeing something similar; it's very intermittent
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:07 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
This adds create/remove window ioctls to create and remove DMA windows.
sPAPR defines a Dynamic DMA windows capability which allows
para-virtualized guests to create additional DMA windows on a PCI bus.
The existing linux kernels
=
CALL FOR PAPERS
10th Workshop on Virtualization in High-Performance Cloud Computing (VHPC '15)
held in conjunction with Euro-Par 2015, August 24-28, Vienna, Austria
(Springer LNCS)
2015-03-09 23:05-0600, James Sullivan:
Hi folks,
This is a small patch that implements logic to handle the RH bit
being set in the msi message address register. Currently the DM bit is
the only thing used to decide irq-dest_mode (logical when DM set,
physical when unset). Documentation
* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 10/03/2015 19:21, Bandan Das wrote:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
On 10/03/2015 17:57, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
I'm seeing something similar; it's very intermittent and generally
happening right at boot of the guest;
On 03/10/2015 12:47 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 09/03/2015 20:49, Avi Kivity wrote:
Yes, and it checked that MAXPHYADDR != 52 before. If you want to set
only one bit, making that bit 51 makes sense anyway for simplicity, so
it is still 99.9% academic. Once processors appear with MAXPHYADDR =
On 10/03/2015 19:21, Bandan Das wrote:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
On 10/03/2015 17:57, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
I'm seeing something similar; it's very intermittent and generally
happening right at boot of the guest; I'm running this on qemu
head+my postcopy world
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:06 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
This checks that the TCE table page size is not bigger that the size of
a page we just pinned and going to put its physical address to the table.
Otherwise the hardware gets unwanted access to physical memory between
the end of
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
dgilb...@redhat.com wrote:
* Andrey Korolyov (and...@xdel.ru) wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
dgilb...@redhat.com wrote:
* Andrey Korolyov (and...@xdel.ru) wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Andrey
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
On 10/03/2015 17:57, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
I'm seeing something similar; it's very intermittent and generally
happening right at boot of the guest; I'm running this on qemu
head+my postcopy world (but it's happening right at boot before
* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 10/03/2015 19:21, Bandan Das wrote:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
On 10/03/2015 17:57, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
I'm seeing something similar; it's very intermittent and generally
happening right at boot of the guest;
On 10/03/2015 19:16, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
KVM internal error. Suberror: 1
emulation failure
EAX= EBX= ECX= EDX=000fd2bc
ESI= EDI= EBP= ESP=
EIP=000fd2c5 EFL=00010007 [-PC] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
ES =0010
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:01:31PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
2015-03-09 20:28-0300, Marcelo Tosatti:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 06:19:18PM -0600, Joel Schopp wrote:
From: David Kaplan david.kap...@amd.com
No need to re-decode WBINVD since we know what it is from the intercept.
On 03/10/2015 08:47 AM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
...
+/*
+ * Set dest_mode to logical just in case both the RH and DM
+ * bits are set, otherwise default to physical.
+ */
+phys = ((e-msi.address_lo (MSI_ADDR_REDIRECTION_LOWPRI |
+
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 09:57 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 03/11/2015 06:56 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:06 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
This checks that the TCE table page size is not bigger that the size of
a page we just pinned and going to put its
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 10:14 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 17:03 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
return (PAGE_SHIFT + compound_order(compound_head(page) = page_shift);
This won't be bool though.
Yes, it will.
Don't you have your parenthesis in the
On 03/11/2015 06:56 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:06 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
This checks that the TCE table page size is not bigger that the size of
a page we just pinned and going to put its physical address to the table.
Otherwise the hardware gets unwanted
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 17:03 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
return (PAGE_SHIFT + compound_order(compound_head(page) = page_shift);
This won't be bool though.
Yes, it will.
Don't you have your parenthesis in the wrong place, Alex ? :-)
This will (I'll do this)
shift = PAGE_SHIFT
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:07 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
This is a pretty mechanical patch to make next patches simpler.
New tce_iommu_unuse_page() helper does put_page() now but it might skip
that after the memory registering patch applied.
As we are here, this removes unnecessary
Am 09.03.2015 um 21:27 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert+rene...@glider.be
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
index
On 03/11/2015 10:03 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 09:57 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 03/11/2015 06:56 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:06 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
This checks that the TCE table page size is not bigger that the size of
a
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 01:43:24PM -0600, Joel Schopp wrote:
Review comments from v1 that used kvm_emulate_wbinvd() pointed out that
kvm_emulate_* was inconsistant in using skipping, while kvm_emulate() always
skips. The first patch cleans up the existing use while the second patch
adds use
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:07 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
The existing IOMMU code takes/releases ownership over the existing IOMMU
tables created by the platform code, i.e. the tables remain in memory
all the time. Also, the existing IOMMU requires VFIO_IOMMU_ENABLE call to
start working
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:07 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
Before the IOMMU user would take control over the IOMMU table belonging to
a specific IOMMU group. This approach did not allow sharing tables between
IOMMU groups attached to the same container.
This introduces a new IOMMU
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 11:54:46AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
POWER supports irqfds but forgot to advertise them. Some userspace does
not check for the capability, but others check it---thus they work on
x86 and s390 but not POWER.
To avoid that other architectures in the future make the
On 03/11/2015 11:09 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:07 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
Before the IOMMU user would take control over the IOMMU table belonging to
a specific IOMMU group. This approach did not allow sharing tables between
IOMMU groups attached to the same
34 matches
Mail list logo
