Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] vhost: Introduce a universal thread to serve all users

Eyal Moscovici writes: > Hi, > > Do you know what is the overhead of switching the vhost thread from one > cgroup to another? I misinterpreted this question earlier. I think what you are asking here is that when the vm process is moved from one cgroup to another, what is the overhead of moving

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Shared vhost design

Hi Michael, "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:07:31AM -0400, Bandan Das wrote: >> Hello, >> >> There have been discussions on improving the current vhost design. The first >> attempt, to my knowledge was Shirley Ma's patch to create a dedicated vhost >> worker per cgroup

Re: [patch -rt 1/2] KVM: use simple waitqueue for vcpu->wq

On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 06:45:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Its just the swait_wake_all() that is not. The entire purpose of them > was to have something that allows bounded execution (RT and all). Still not sure i that might be a too big burden for mainline, but at least it's not as severe.