On 2015/12/31 15:13, Jason Wang wrote:
This patch tries to implement an device IOTLB for vhost. This could be
used with for co-operation with userspace(qemu) implementation of
iommu for a secure DMA environment in guest.
The idea is simple. When vhost meets an IOTLB miss, it will request
the
On 2015年12月30日 00:46, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Interesting. So you sare saying merely ifdown/ifup is 100ms?
> This does not sound reasonable.
> Is there a chance you are e.g. getting IP from dhcp?
>
> If so that is wrong - clearly should reconfigure the old IP
> back without playing with dhcp.
> -Original Message-
> From: Radim Krčmář [mailto:rkrc...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 1:22 AM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: pbonz...@redhat.com; kvm@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: Add lowest-priority
On 01/04/2016 09:39 AM, Yang Zhang wrote:
> On 2015/12/31 15:13, Jason Wang wrote:
>> This patch tries to implement an device IOTLB for vhost. This could be
>> used with for co-operation with userspace(qemu) implementation of
>> iommu for a secure DMA environment in guest.
>>
>> The idea is
On 12/31/2015 07:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 03:13:45PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> This patch tries to implement an device IOTLB for vhost. This could be
>> used with for co-operation with userspace(qemu) implementation of
>> iommu for a secure DMA environment in
On 12/22/2015 05:07 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> This series is based on v4.4-rc2 and the "virtio: make find_vqs()
> checkpatch.pl-friendly" patch I recently submitted.
>
> v4:
> * Addressed code review comments from Alex Bennee
> * MAINTAINERS file entries for new files
> * Trace events