On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:59:13AM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Dave P Martin wrote:
> > Currently, kvmtool unconditionally declares that HVC should be used
> > to call PSCI, so the function numbers in the DT tell the guest
> > nothing about the function ID name
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:09:24PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 03:43:49PM +, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > When the guest accesses I/O memory this will create data abort
> > exceptions and they are handled by decoding the HSR information
> > (physical address, read/write,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:55:13PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Compile-tested only, but shows what it looks like (ugly).
>
> I just used the existing code and didn't crack open my ARM books to
> determine if there's a better way. The struct names are pretty vague,
> too, as a result.
>
Thanks
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 10:00:25AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 01:53:26PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > A good starting point would be load/store emulation as this seems to be a
> > common theme, and we would need a credible deployment for any ne
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:12:09PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 13:53 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 05:49:21PM -0400, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > On S
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 05:49:21PM -0400, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 04:35:59PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >> When the guest accesses I/O memory this will create data abort
> >> exceptions and they are handled by
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Richard Earnshaw
wrote:
> On 08/03/12 17:21, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/03/12 21:15, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
So, to me, the gcc documentation is perfectly clear on this topic.
there really _is_ a guarantee
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 09:58:23AM +, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 02/03/12 21:15, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > [ coming back from vacation and trying to catch up ]
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Dave Martin wrote:
> >
> >> Just had a chat with some tools guys
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:10:29AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:58:26PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:34 +, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > &
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:52:38PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:34 +, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 201
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:44:24PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 12:58 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:34 +, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Fe
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:34 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:28:29PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> > > I don't have a very strong opinion on which register we should use, but
&
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:34 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:28:29PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> > > I don't have a very strong opinion on which register we should use, but
&
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:28:29PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 10:20 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 07:33:39PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2012-02-27 at
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 07:33:39PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 18:03 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:27:23PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 17:48 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 07:48:45PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 17:53 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:48:22PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > We need a register to pass the hypercall number because we might not
> > >
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:27:23PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 17:48 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > We need a register to pass the hypercall number because we might not
> > know it at compile time and HVC only takes an immediate argument.
> >
> > Among the available re
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:48:22PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> We need a register to pass the hypercall number because we might not
> know it at compile time and HVC only takes an immediate argument.
>
> Among the available registers r12 seems to be the best choice because it
> is defined a
18 matches
Mail list logo
