+cc Gleb, KVM guys,
On 12/09/2014 12:38 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 8 December 2014 at 15:38, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:50:21 +
>> Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Why can't the kernel handle our just destroying the vcpu and
>>> later recreating it if necessary? That seems the
the email you linked,
>>> then no since it tries to destroy vcpu, but does it incorrectly. If you
>>> mean proposal to "park" unplugged vcpu, so that guest will not be able
>>> to use it, then yes, it is pragmatic path forward.
>>>
>>>
>>>
Hi Gleb,
On 05/23/2014 05:43 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> CCing Paolo.
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 01:45:55PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
>> Hi Gleb,
>> Excuse me for offline noisy.
> You will get much quicker response if you'll post to the list :)
Got it.:)
>
&g
