anox to see if they've tested it with KVM.
Regards,
HUANG, Zhiteng
-Original Message-
From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
Reeted
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2010 9:39 PM
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Status of SR-IOV ?
Hello kvm ML
Is SR
PLE-like design may be more generic than para-virtish when it comes to Windows
guest.
Is this busy-spin actually a Lock Holder Preemption problem?
Regards,
HUANG, Zhiteng
-Original Message-
From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
Balbir Singh
lly appreciate you guys' work and would
love to provide feedback from my point of view if needed.
Regards,
HUANG, Zhiteng
Intel SSG/SSD/SPA/PRC Scalability Lab
-Original Message-
From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
Avi Kivity
Sent: Wed
al VMs and then VMs on machine A (pool A) paired
up with VMs on machine B (pool B). Sending packets between two VM pools
yielded 20% utilization difference.
Did you test bi-direction traffic, i.e. first pool A sends and pool B receives
then vice versa?
Regards,
HUANG, Zhiteng
-Origin
By same traffic load, do you mean same amount of packets or traffic with same
bandwidth or anything else?
Regards,
HUANG, Zhiteng
-Original Message-
From: lidong chen [mailto:chen.lidong.ker...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 2:53 PM
To: Huang, Zhiteng
Cc: t
