On Friday, September 07, 2012 09:19:04 AM Rusty Russell wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 05:27:23PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> >> > Yes without checksum net core always linearizes packets, so yes it is
> >> > screwed.
> >> > Fo
On Friday, March 23, 2012 05:45:40 PM David Ahern wrote:
> On 3/23/12 12:32 PM, Thomas Lendacky wrote:
> > Quick description of the tests:
> >TCP_RR and UDP_RR using 256 byte request/response size in 1, 10, 30
> >and 60 instances
> >TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERT
On Friday, March 23, 2012 12:00:54 PM Rick Jones wrote:
> On 03/23/2012 11:32 AM, Thomas Lendacky wrote:
> > I ran a series of TCP_RR, UDP_RR, TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS tests
> > against the recent vhost patches. For simplicity, the patches
> > submitted by Anthony that i
I ran a series of TCP_RR, UDP_RR, TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS tests
against the recent vhost patches. For simplicity, the patches
submitted by Anthony that increase the number of threads per vhost
instance I will call multi-worker and the patches submitted by Shirley
that provide a vhost thread per c
