Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio-ring: Allocate indirect buffers from cache when possible

2012-09-10 Thread Thomas Lendacky
On Friday, September 07, 2012 09:19:04 AM Rusty Russell wrote: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes: On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 05:27:23PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes: Yes without checksum net core always linearizes packets, so yes it is

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] NUMA aware scheduling per cpu vhost thread

2012-03-27 Thread Thomas Lendacky
On Friday, March 23, 2012 05:45:40 PM David Ahern wrote: On 3/23/12 12:32 PM, Thomas Lendacky wrote: Quick description of the tests: TCP_RR and UDP_RR using 256 byte request/response size in 1, 10, 30 and 60 instances TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS using 256, 1K, 4K and 16K message

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] NUMA aware scheduling per cpu vhost thread

2012-03-23 Thread Thomas Lendacky
I ran a series of TCP_RR, UDP_RR, TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS tests against the recent vhost patches. For simplicity, the patches submitted by Anthony that increase the number of threads per vhost instance I will call multi-worker and the patches submitted by Shirley that provide a vhost thread per

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] NUMA aware scheduling per cpu vhost thread

2012-03-23 Thread Thomas Lendacky
On Friday, March 23, 2012 12:00:54 PM Rick Jones wrote: On 03/23/2012 11:32 AM, Thomas Lendacky wrote: I ran a series of TCP_RR, UDP_RR, TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS tests against the recent vhost patches. For simplicity, the patches submitted by Anthony that increase the number of threads per