On 8/23/11 4:04 AM, Joerg Roedel joerg.roe...@amd.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:52:18PM -0400, aafabbri wrote:
You have to enforce group/iommu domain assignment whether you have the
existing uiommu API, or if you change it to your proposed
ioctl(inherit_iommu) API.
The only
On 8/20/11 9:51 AM, Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
We had an extremely productive VFIO BoF on Monday. Here's my attempt to
capture the plan that I think we agreed to:
We need to address both the description and enforcement of device
groups. Groups are formed any time
On 8/22/11 1:49 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 13:29 -0700, aafabbri wrote:
Each device fd would then support a
similar set of ioctls and mapping (mmio/pio/config) interface as current
vfio, except for the obvious domain and dma ioctls
On 8/22/11 2:49 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
wrote:
I wouldn't use uiommu for that.
Any particular reason besides saving a file descriptor?
We use it today, and it seems like a cleaner API than what you propose
changing it to.
Well for one, we are back to
