Hello,
Currently both Xen and OpenVZ are well known and mature product used
in hosting companies.
How about KVM? What are the advantages if I use KVM as the VPS solution?
E.g.
performance?
security?
maintainity?
I am not familar with KVM so want to know your opinion.
Thanks.
--
To
Hey,
I am comparing Xen and KVM to see which one is suitable for me usage.
From the FAQ:
http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/FAQ#What_is_the_difference_between_kvm_and_Xen.3F
It said:
kvm does not support paravirtualization for cpu but may support
paravirtualization for device drivers to
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 10:40:00PM +0800, howard chen wrote:
Yes, paravirtualization is good. If running KVM, use paravirtualized network
and disk/block drivers for better performance.
So does it mean generally Xen is more
