Re: [Autotest] [PATCH] Monotonic time test: Don't force static compilation of time_test

2010-03-23 Thread Martin Bligh
+cc:md (he wrote the test). On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > The Makefile for the monotonic_test C program forces static > compilation of the object files. Since we are compiling the > code already, not having a static binary doesn't make much > of a difference

Re: [Autotest] [PATCH] Monotonic time test: Don't force static compilation of time_test

2010-03-23 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Martin Bligh wrote: > +cc:md (he wrote the test). > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues > wrote: >> The Makefile for the monotonic_test C program forces static >> compilation of the object files. Since we are compiling the >> code already,

Re: [Autotest] [PATCH] Monotonic time test: Don't force static compilation of time_test

2010-03-23 Thread Martin Bligh
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Martin Bligh wrote: >> +cc:md (he wrote the test). >> >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues >> wrote: >>> The Makefile for the monotonic_test C program forces static >>> co

Re: [Autotest] [PATCH] Monotonic time test: Don't force static compilation of time_test

2010-03-23 Thread Jason Wang
Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Martin Bligh wrote: +cc:md (he wrote the test). On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: The Makefile for the monotonic_test C program forces static compilation of the object files. Since we are