On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 04:00:45AM -0400, Michael Goldish wrote:
>
> - "Yolkfull Chow" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:45:23AM -0400, Michael Goldish wrote:
> > >
> > > - "Yolkfull Chow" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Michael, I just have some comments on what you changed on
> > > >
- "Yolkfull Chow" wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:45:23AM -0400, Michael Goldish wrote:
> >
> > - "Yolkfull Chow" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Michael, I just have some comments on what you changed on
> > > stress_boot. :-)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:58:21AM +0300, Mich
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:45:23AM -0400, Michael Goldish wrote:
>
> - "Yolkfull Chow" wrote:
>
> > Hi Michael, I just have some comments on what you changed on
> > stress_boot. :-)
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:58:21AM +0300, Michael Goldish wrote:
> > > Take an additional parame
- "Yolkfull Chow" wrote:
> Hi Michael, I just have some comments on what you changed on
> stress_boot. :-)
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:58:21AM +0300, Michael Goldish wrote:
> > Take an additional parameter 'clone_address_index_base' which
> indicates the
> > initial value for 'address
Hi Michael, I just have some comments on what you changed on
stress_boot. :-)
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:58:21AM +0300, Michael Goldish wrote:
> Take an additional parameter 'clone_address_index_base' which indicates the
> initial value for 'address_index' for the cloned VMs. This value is
> inc
Take an additional parameter 'clone_address_index_base' which indicates the
initial value for 'address_index' for the cloned VMs. This value is
incremented after each clone is created. I assume the original VM has a single
NIC; otherwise NICs will end up sharing MAC addresses, which is bad.
Also