On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Lukáš Doktor wrote:
> Hello Lucas,
>
> I like your patch but I'm not entirely convinced about it necessity.
> Stable version of KVM should have this fixed and unstable ones are for
> developers, who are skilled enough to fix this using kvm_test.cfg.
>
> On the other
ted above so please tell me what you think.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues"
> To: autot...@test.kernel.org
> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, ldok...@redhat.com, ry...@us.ibm.com,
> mgold...@redhat.com, "
Hello Lucas,
I like your patch but I'm not entirely convinced about it necessity.
Stable version of KVM should have this fixed and unstable ones are for
developers, who are skilled enough to fix this using kvm_test.cfg.
On the other hand keep this patch somewhere. Eventually if qemu started
al Message -
From: "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues"
To: autot...@test.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, ldok...@redhat.com, ry...@us.ibm.com,
mgold...@redhat.com, "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues"
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 6:40:29 AM (GMT+0200) Auto-Detected
Subject: [KVM AUTOTEST PATCH] [R
In order to make it easier to figure out problems and
also to avoid aborting tests prematurely due to
incompatible qemu options, keep record of supported
qemu options, and if extra options are passed to qemu,
verify if they are amongst the supported options. Also,
try to replace known misspelings o
