On 11/03/2009 05:05 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/03/2009 05:29 PM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:38:18AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/03/2009 01:25 PM, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
not sure if i'm missing the point here, but couldn't it be
hypothetically
extended to stuff 3d (or
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 06:05:13PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> cirrus has pretty good 2d acceleration. 3D is a mega-project though.
>>>
>> Cirrus has no blending/compositing hardware support.
>> Paravirtualized graphics can easily support full XRender-style
>> 2D acceleration.
>
> What do t
On 11/03/2009 05:29 PM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:38:18AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/03/2009 01:25 PM, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
not sure if i'm missing the point here, but couldn't it be hypothetically
extended to stuff 3d (or video& more 2d accel ?) command
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:38:18AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/03/2009 01:25 PM, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> > not sure if i'm missing the point here, but couldn't it be hypothetically
> > extended to stuff 3d (or video& more 2d accel ?) commands too ? I can't
> > imagine the cirrus or stdvga dr
