Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 10:17 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Those void returns are bogus, but there is no need to check for
>> allocation failures anyway.
>
> Looks good:
>
> Acked-by: Mark McLoughlin
>
> but should be re-done as a patch against qemu and sent to qemu-devel.
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 10:17 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Those void returns are bogus, but there is no need to check for
> allocation failures anyway.
Looks good:
Acked-by: Mark McLoughlin
but should be re-done as a patch against qemu and sent to qemu-devel.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from
Those void returns are bogus, but there is no need to check for
allocation failures anyway.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
diff --git a/qemu/hw/virtio-net.c b/qemu/hw/virtio-net.c
index f125edc..35f66d7 100644
--- a/qemu/hw/virtio-net.c
+++ b/qemu/hw/virtio-net.c
@@ -692,12 +692,8 @@ PCIDevice *virti
