Re: [PATCH] IOzone test: Introduce postprocessing module v2

2010-05-03 Thread Martin Bligh
yup, fair enough. Go ahead and check it in. If we end up doing this in another test, we should make an abstraction On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 16:52 -0700, Martin Bligh wrote: >> only thing that strikes me is whether the gnuplot support

Re: [PATCH] IOzone test: Introduce postprocessing module v2

2010-05-03 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 16:52 -0700, Martin Bligh wrote: > only thing that strikes me is whether the gnuplot support > should be abstracted out a bit. See tko/plotgraph.py ? I thought about it. Ideally, we would do all the plotting using a python library, such as matplotlib, which has a decent API.

Re: [PATCH] IOzone test: Introduce postprocessing module v2

2010-05-03 Thread Martin Bligh
only thing that strikes me is whether the gnuplot support should be abstracted out a bit. See tko/plotgraph.py ? On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > This module contains code to postprocess IOzone data > in a convenient way so we can generate performance graphs > an

[PATCH] IOzone test: Introduce postprocessing module v2

2010-05-03 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
This module contains code to postprocess IOzone data in a convenient way so we can generate performance graphs and condensed data. The graph generation part depends on gnuplot, but if the utility is not present, functionality will gracefully degrade. Use the postprocessing module introduced on the