On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 8 August 2011 13:56, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
QEMU deals with a lot of fixed width integer types; their names
(uint64_t etc) are clumsy to use and take up a lot of space.
Following Linux, introduce shorter names, for example U64 for
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 8 August 2011 13:56, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
QEMU deals with a lot of fixed width integer types; their names
(uint64_t etc) are clumsy to use and take up a lot of space.
Following Linux, introduce shorter names, for example U64 for
QEMU deals with a lot of fixed width integer types; their names
(uint64_t etc) are clumsy to use and take up a lot of space.
Following Linux, introduce shorter names, for example U64 for
uint64_t.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
---
qemu-common.h |9 +
1 files changed, 9
On 08/08/2011 07:56 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
QEMU deals with a lot of fixed width integer types; their names
(uint64_t etc) are clumsy to use and take up a lot of space.
Following Linux, introduce shorter names, for example U64 for
uint64_t.
Except Linux uses lower case letters.
I personally
On 08/08/2011 04:00 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 08/08/2011 07:56 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
QEMU deals with a lot of fixed width integer types; their names
(uint64_t etc) are clumsy to use and take up a lot of space.
Following Linux, introduce shorter names, for example U64 for
uint64_t.
Except
On 08/08/2011 08:12 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/08/2011 04:00 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 08/08/2011 07:56 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
QEMU deals with a lot of fixed width integer types; their names
(uint64_t etc) are clumsy to use and take up a lot of space.
Following Linux, introduce shorter
On 8 August 2011 13:56, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
QEMU deals with a lot of fixed width integer types; their names
(uint64_t etc) are clumsy to use and take up a lot of space.
Following Linux, introduce shorter names, for example U64 for
uint64_t.
Strongly disagree. uint64_t c are
On 08/08/2011 04:17 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This is one of the few areas that we're actually consistent with
today. Introducing a new set of types will just create inconsistency.
Most importantly, these are standard types. Every modern library and
C program should be using them. TBH,
Am 08.08.2011 15:00, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 08/08/2011 07:56 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
QEMU deals with a lot of fixed width integer types; their names
(uint64_t etc) are clumsy to use and take up a lot of space.
Following Linux, introduce shorter names, for example U64 for
uint64_t.