Without this information, users will just see unexpected performance
problems and there is little chance we will get good reports from them:
note that mmio generation is increased even when we just start, or stop,
dirty logging for some memory slot, in which case users should never
expect all
Il 20/06/2013 10:59, Takuya Yoshikawa ha scritto:
Without this information, users will just see unexpected performance
problems and there is little chance we will get good reports from them:
note that mmio generation is increased even when we just start, or stop,
dirty logging for some memory
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:59:54PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/06/2013 10:59, Takuya Yoshikawa ha scritto:
Without this information, users will just see unexpected performance
problems and there is little chance we will get good reports from them:
note that mmio generation is
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:45:04 +0300
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:59:54PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/06/2013 10:59, Takuya Yoshikawa ha scritto:
Without this information, users will just see unexpected performance
problems and there is little chance
Il 20/06/2013 13:45, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:59:54PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/06/2013 10:59, Takuya Yoshikawa ha scritto:
Without this information, users will just see unexpected performance
problems and there is little chance we will get good reports from
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 02:35:36PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/06/2013 13:45, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:59:54PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/06/2013 10:59, Takuya Yoshikawa ha scritto:
Without this information, users will just see unexpected performance
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 09:28:37PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:45:04 +0300
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:59:54PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/06/2013 10:59, Takuya Yoshikawa ha scritto:
Without this information, users
Il 20/06/2013 14:54, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
If they see mysterious peformance problems induced by this wraparound, the
only
way to know the cause later is by this kind of information in the syslog.
So even the first wraparound may better be printed out IMO.
Think about starting hundreds
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:54:38 +0300
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 09:28:37PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:45:04 +0300
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:59:54PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:14:42 +0200
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 20/06/2013 14:54, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
If they see mysterious peformance problems induced by this wraparound, the
only
way to know the cause later is by this kind of information in the syslog.
So even the
10 matches
Mail list logo
