On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:09:32AM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
> Before moving the 3 functions ahead, they will be declared twice in
> the same file before handle_vmon(). I don't know if this small change
> can be committed together in one patch. If this change is needless or
> should be committ
On 2013-07-03 18:05, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
> Set success rflags after emulating VMXON/VMXOFF in nested environment.
>
> Re-arrange the code sequence of 3 functions,
> nested_vmx_succeed()/failValid()/failInvalid(), to avoid double
> declaration in the same file.
Just don't forget to provide cor
Before moving the 3 functions ahead, they will be declared twice in
the same file before handle_vmon(). I don't know if this small change
can be committed together in one patch. If this change is needless or
should be committed in a separate patch, tell me and I will commit
another version.
Arthur
Set success rflags after emulating VMXON/VMXOFF in nested environment.
Re-arrange the code sequence of 3 functions,
nested_vmx_succeed()/failValid()/failInvalid(), to avoid double
declaration in the same file.
Signed-off-by: Arthur Chunqi Li
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 85 +++
