On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 13:17 +0300, Michael Goldish wrote:
> On 05/04/2010 01:03 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> > Following the new IOzone postprocessing changes, add a new
> > KVM subtest iozone_windows, which takes advantage of the
> > fact that there's a windows build for the test, so we c
On 05/04/2010 01:03 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> Following the new IOzone postprocessing changes, add a new
> KVM subtest iozone_windows, which takes advantage of the
> fact that there's a windows build for the test, so we can
> ship it on winutils.iso and run it, providing this way
> the
Following the new IOzone postprocessing changes, add a new
KVM subtest iozone_windows, which takes advantage of the
fact that there's a windows build for the test, so we can
ship it on winutils.iso and run it, providing this way
the ability to track IO performance for windows guests also.
The new t
