Re: [PATCH] Revert "target-ppc: Create versionless CPU class per family if KVM"

2015-03-04 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
On 03/05/2015 01:55 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 03.03.2015 um 23:14 schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy: On 03/04/2015 07:43 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 03.03.15 01:42, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: On 03/03/2015 12:51 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 02.03.15 14:42, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 02.03.2015

Re: [PATCH] Revert "target-ppc: Create versionless CPU class per family if KVM"

2015-03-04 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 03.03.2015 um 23:14 schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy: > On 03/04/2015 07:43 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 03.03.15 01:42, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>> On 03/03/2015 12:51 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 02.03.15 14:42, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 02.03.2015 um 14:37 schrieb Alexander Graf:

Re: [PATCH] Revert "target-ppc: Create versionless CPU class per family if KVM"

2015-03-03 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
On 03/04/2015 07:43 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 03.03.15 01:42, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: On 03/03/2015 12:51 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 02.03.15 14:42, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 02.03.2015 um 14:37 schrieb Alexander Graf: On 01.03.15 01:31, Andreas Färber wrote: This reverts commit

Re: [PATCH] Revert "target-ppc: Create versionless CPU class per family if KVM"

2015-03-03 Thread Alexander Graf
On 03.03.15 01:42, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 03/03/2015 12:51 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> >> On 02.03.15 14:42, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Am 02.03.2015 um 14:37 schrieb Alexander Graf: On 01.03.15 01:31, Andreas Färber wrote: > This reverts commit 5b79b1cadd3e565b6d1a5ba59764b

Re: [PATCH] Revert "target-ppc: Create versionless CPU class per family if KVM"

2015-03-02 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
On 03/03/2015 12:51 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 02.03.15 14:42, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 02.03.2015 um 14:37 schrieb Alexander Graf: On 01.03.15 01:31, Andreas Färber wrote: This reverts commit 5b79b1cadd3e565b6d1a5ba59764bd47af58b271 to avoid double-registration of types: Registering `

Re: [PATCH] Revert "target-ppc: Create versionless CPU class per family if KVM"

2015-03-02 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 02.03.2015 um 14:51 schrieb Alexander Graf: > On 02.03.15 14:42, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 02.03.2015 um 14:37 schrieb Alexander Graf: >>> On 01.03.15 01:31, Andreas Färber wrote: This reverts commit 5b79b1cadd3e565b6d1a5ba59764bd47af58b271 to avoid double-registration of types:

Re: [PATCH] Revert "target-ppc: Create versionless CPU class per family if KVM"

2015-03-02 Thread Alexander Graf
On 02.03.15 14:42, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 02.03.2015 um 14:37 schrieb Alexander Graf: >> On 01.03.15 01:31, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> This reverts commit 5b79b1cadd3e565b6d1a5ba59764bd47af58b271 to avoid >>> double-registration of types: >>> >>> Registering `POWER5+-powerpc64-cpu' which alr

Re: [PATCH] Revert "target-ppc: Create versionless CPU class per family if KVM"

2015-03-02 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 02.03.2015 um 14:37 schrieb Alexander Graf: > On 01.03.15 01:31, Andreas Färber wrote: >> This reverts commit 5b79b1cadd3e565b6d1a5ba59764bd47af58b271 to avoid >> double-registration of types: >> >> Registering `POWER5+-powerpc64-cpu' which already exists >> >> Taking the textual description o

[PATCH] Revert "target-ppc: Create versionless CPU class per family if KVM"

2015-02-28 Thread Andreas Färber
This reverts commit 5b79b1cadd3e565b6d1a5ba59764bd47af58b271 to avoid double-registration of types: Registering `POWER5+-powerpc64-cpu' which already exists Taking the textual description of a CPU type as part of a new type name is plain wrong, and so is unconditionally registering a new type h