On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:44:31AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:27:19AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
At best the current code only seems to free the leaf pagetables and
the root. If you're unlucky enough to have a large gap (like any
QEMU guest with more than
: Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:27:19 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Fix leaks in pagetable freeing
upstream commit: 3269ee0bd6686baf86630300d528500ac5b516d7
At best the current code only seems to free the leaf pagetables and
the root. If you're unlucky
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:27:19AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
At best the current code only seems to free the leaf pagetables and
the root. If you're unlucky enough to have a large gap (like any
QEMU guest with more than 3G of memory), only the first chunk of leaf
pagetables are freed
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:25:19AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
This is a pretty massive memory leak, anyone @Intel care? Thanks,
Alex
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 10:27 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
At best the current code only seems to free the leaf pagetables and
the root. If you're
This is a pretty massive memory leak, anyone @Intel care? Thanks,
Alex
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 10:27 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
At best the current code only seems to free the leaf pagetables and
the root. If you're unlucky enough to have a large gap (like any
QEMU guest with more than 3G
At best the current code only seems to free the leaf pagetables and
the root. If you're unlucky enough to have a large gap (like any
QEMU guest with more than 3G of memory), only the first chunk of leaf
pagetables are freed (plus the root). This is a massive memory leak.
This patch re-writes the
