Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Fix use after release during device attach

2011-01-04 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 10.12.2010 19:44, Chris Wright wrote: > * Jan Kiszka (jan.kis...@siemens.com) wrote: > --- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c > @@ -3627,9 +3627,9 @@ static int intel_iommu_attach_device(struct > iommu_domain *domain, > > pte = dmar_do

Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Fix use after release during device attach

2010-12-10 Thread Chris Wright
* Jan Kiszka (jan.kis...@siemens.com) wrote: > >>> --- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c > >>> @@ -3627,9 +3627,9 @@ static int intel_iommu_attach_device(struct > >>> iommu_domain *domain, > >>> > >>> pte = dmar_domain->pgd; > >>> if (dma_pte_pres

Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Fix use after release during device attach

2010-12-10 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 14.11.2010 10:18, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Am 02.11.2010 08:31, Sheng Yang wrote: >> On Tuesday 02 November 2010 15:05:51 Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> From: Jan Kiszka >>> >>> Obtail the new pgd pointer before releasing the page containing this >>> value. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka >>> --- >>> >>>

Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Fix use after release during device attach

2010-11-14 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 02.11.2010 08:31, Sheng Yang wrote: > On Tuesday 02 November 2010 15:05:51 Jan Kiszka wrote: >> From: Jan Kiszka >> >> Obtail the new pgd pointer before releasing the page containing this >> value. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka >> --- >> >> Who is taking care of this? The kvm tree? >> >> dr

Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Fix use after release during device attach

2010-11-02 Thread Sheng Yang
On Tuesday 02 November 2010 15:31:22 Sheng Yang wrote: > On Tuesday 02 November 2010 15:05:51 Jan Kiszka wrote: > > From: Jan Kiszka > > > > Obtail the new pgd pointer before releasing the page containing this > > value. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka > > --- > > > > Who is taking care of t

Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Fix use after release during device attach

2010-11-02 Thread Sheng Yang
On Tuesday 02 November 2010 15:46:11 Jan Kiszka wrote: > Am 02.11.2010 08:31, Sheng Yang wrote: > > On Tuesday 02 November 2010 15:05:51 Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> From: Jan Kiszka > >> > >> Obtail the new pgd pointer before releasing the page containing this > >> value. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan

Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Fix use after release during device attach

2010-11-02 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 02.11.2010 08:31, Sheng Yang wrote: > On Tuesday 02 November 2010 15:05:51 Jan Kiszka wrote: >> From: Jan Kiszka >> >> Obtail the new pgd pointer before releasing the page containing this >> value. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka >> --- >> >> Who is taking care of this? The kvm tree? >> >> dr

Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Fix use after release during device attach

2010-11-02 Thread Sheng Yang
On Tuesday 02 November 2010 15:05:51 Jan Kiszka wrote: > From: Jan Kiszka > > Obtail the new pgd pointer before releasing the page containing this > value. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka > --- > > Who is taking care of this? The kvm tree? > > drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c |2 +- > 1 files cha

[PATCH] intel-iommu: Fix use after release during device attach

2010-11-02 Thread Jan Kiszka
From: Jan Kiszka Obtail the new pgd pointer before releasing the page containing this value. Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka --- Who is taking care of this? The kvm tree? drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b