On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:08:25PM -0500, Hu Yaohui wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
Thanks for your replying!
I hope you have a good day! I am sorry that it's not that obvious to
me after I checked that function.
If the remote vcpu is not in the same pcpu as the sender which calls
kvm_vpcu_kick.
Before
Thank you Marcelo!
I really appreciate your explanation.
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:08:25PM -0500, Hu Yaohui wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
Thanks for your replying!
I hope you have a good day! I am sorry that it's not that
Hi Macelo,
I am sorry to bother you again. In your first possibility,
kvm_vcpu_kick sends an host-IPI to the remote vcpu,
and if that vcpu is in guest mode, a VM-exit will be triggered due to
the host-IPI. My question is if the vcpu has
accessed the stale tlb entry before the host-IPI arrives,
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:35:00PM -0500, Hu Yaohui wrote:
Thanks a lot Marcelo!
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:14:15PM -0500, Hu Yaohui wrote:
Hi guys,
I think you should be pretty familiar with lapic. I would really
Thanks a lot Marcelo!
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:35:00PM -0500, Hu Yaohui wrote:
Thanks a lot Marcelo!
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:14:15PM
Hi Marcelo,
Thanks for your replying!
I hope you have a good day! I am sorry that it's not that obvious to
me after I checked that function.
If the remote vcpu is not in the same pcpu as the sender which calls
kvm_vpcu_kick.
Before the remote vcpu received the Host-IPI, it could be in guest
mode
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 05:14:11PM +0800, Chen Fan wrote:
fix the 'vcpi' typos when apic_debug is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Chen Fan chen.fan.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from
Hi guys,
I think you should be pretty familiar with lapic. I would really
appreciate it if someone could shed some lights on my problem
regarding Guest TLB flush IPI.
Supposed we get two vcpus 0 and 1.
When vcpu#0 wants to invalidate the tlb entry on vcpu#1. An IPI will
be generated by lapic on
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:14:15PM -0500, Hu Yaohui wrote:
Hi guys,
I think you should be pretty familiar with lapic. I would really
appreciate it if someone could shed some lights on my problem
regarding Guest TLB flush IPI.
Supposed we get two vcpus 0 and 1.
When vcpu#0 wants to invalidate
Thanks a lot Marcelo!
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:14:15PM -0500, Hu Yaohui wrote:
Hi guys,
I think you should be pretty familiar with lapic. I would really
appreciate it if someone could shed some lights on my problem
fix the 'vcpi' typos when apic_debug is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Chen Fan chen.fan.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
index dec48bf..ce736ec 100644
---
11 matches
Mail list logo
