On 22/12/2014 10:01, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> I can send out as a patch if we have on any objections.
No problem, I will apply it to kvm/queue.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
On 2014/12/19 19:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 19/12/2014 03:32, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
Are you saying something below?
if (enable_apicv)
...
else {
kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_irr_update = NULL;
Yes.
But this means we have to revise hadware_setup() to get 'kvm' inside,
This would not eve
On 19/12/2014 03:32, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
>
> Are you saying something below?
>
> if (enable_apicv)
> ...
> else {
> kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_irr_update = NULL;
Yes.
> But this means we have to revise hadware_setup() to get 'kvm' inside,
This would not even be possible, since hardware_setu
On 2014/12/1 19:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 01/12/2014 10:28, Tiejun Chen wrote:
In most cases calling hwapic_isr_update(), actually we always
check if kvm_apic_vid_enabled() == 1, and also actually,
kvm_apic_vid_enabled()
-> kvm_x86_ops->vm_has_apicv()
-> vmx_vm_has_apicv() or '
On 01/12/2014 10:28, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> In most cases calling hwapic_isr_update(), actually we always
> check if kvm_apic_vid_enabled() == 1, and also actually,
> kvm_apic_vid_enabled()
> -> kvm_x86_ops->vm_has_apicv()
> -> vmx_vm_has_apicv() or '0' in svm case
>
> So its unnecessa
In most cases calling hwapic_isr_update(), actually we always
check if kvm_apic_vid_enabled() == 1, and also actually,
kvm_apic_vid_enabled()
-> kvm_x86_ops->vm_has_apicv()
-> vmx_vm_has_apicv() or '0' in svm case
So its unnecessary to recall this inside hwapic_isr_update(), here
just
