On 2014-02-25 15:26, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 24/02/2014 16:58, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
>> On 2014-02-24 16:25, Marius Vlad wrote:
>>> Commit 3b1274463fa8d074dd3bc77efe25b59a4ddd491e uses GCCs extension
>>> labels as values to handle exceptions, but GCC 4.8 ``mistakingly''
>>> uses the next body fu
Il 24/02/2014 16:58, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
On 2014-02-24 16:25, Marius Vlad wrote:
Commit 3b1274463fa8d074dd3bc77efe25b59a4ddd491e uses GCCs extension
labels as values to handle exceptions, but GCC 4.8 ``mistakingly''
uses the next body function as a jump label, for functions which
do not retur
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 04:58:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2014-02-24 16:25, Marius Vlad wrote:
> > Commit 3b1274463fa8d074dd3bc77efe25b59a4ddd491e uses GCCs extension
> > labels as values to handle exceptions, but GCC 4.8 ``mistakingly''
> > uses the next body function as a jump label, for f
On 2014-02-24 16:25, Marius Vlad wrote:
> Commit 3b1274463fa8d074dd3bc77efe25b59a4ddd491e uses GCCs extension
> labels as values to handle exceptions, but GCC 4.8 ``mistakingly''
> uses the next body function as a jump label, for functions which
> do not return. Fixed by returning a int value for t
Commit 3b1274463fa8d074dd3bc77efe25b59a4ddd491e uses GCCs extension
labels as values to handle exceptions, but GCC 4.8 ``mistakingly''
uses the next body function as a jump label, for functions which
do not return. Fixed by returning a int value for those functions.
See http://thread.gmane.org/gma