于 2011/12/16,星期五 17:46, Sasha Levin 写道:
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 17:33 +0800, Zang Hongyong wrote:
Do you see an issue with increasing kvm-ram_size?
Yes, it will cause some problems after simply increase the kvm-ram_size.
For examples:
In kvm__init_ram() code we use kvm-ram_size to calculate the
于 2011/12/16,星期五 15:23, Sasha Levin 写道:
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 15:02 +0800, Zang Hongyong wrote:
于 2011/12/16,星期五 13:50, Sasha Levin 写道:
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 09:01 +0800, zanghongy...@huawei.com wrote:
If a guest's ram_size exceeds KVM_32BIT_GAP_START, the corresponding kvm
tool's
virtual
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 16:36 +0800, Zang Hongyong wrote:
于 2011/12/16,星期五 15:23, Sasha Levin 写道:
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 15:02 +0800, Zang Hongyong wrote:
于 2011/12/16,星期五 13:50, Sasha Levin 写道:
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 09:01 +0800, zanghongy...@huawei.com wrote:
If a guest's ram_size exceeds
于 2011/12/16,星期五 16:45, Sasha Levin 写道:
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 16:36 +0800, Zang Hongyong wrote:
于 2011/12/16,星期五 15:23, Sasha Levin 写道:
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 15:02 +0800, Zang Hongyong wrote:
于 2011/12/16,星期五 13:50, Sasha Levin 写道:
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 09:01 +0800, zanghongy...@huawei.com
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 17:33 +0800, Zang Hongyong wrote:
Do you see an issue with increasing kvm-ram_size?
Yes, it will cause some problems after simply increase the kvm-ram_size.
For examples:
In kvm__init_ram() code we use kvm-ram_size to calculate the size of
the second
RAM range from
From: Hongyong Zang zanghongy...@huawei.com
If a guest's ram_size exceeds KVM_32BIT_GAP_START, the corresponding kvm tool's
virtual address size should be (ram_size + KVM_32BIT_GAP_SIZE), rather than
ram_size.
Signed-off-by: Hongyong Zang zanghongy...@huawei.com
---
tools/kvm/x86/kvm.c |4
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 09:01 +0800, zanghongy...@huawei.com wrote:
If a guest's ram_size exceeds KVM_32BIT_GAP_START, the corresponding kvm
tool's
virtual address size should be (ram_size + KVM_32BIT_GAP_SIZE), rather than
ram_size.
You're right.
There are more places than just the
于 2011/12/16,星期五 13:50, Sasha Levin 写道:
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 09:01 +0800, zanghongy...@huawei.com wrote:
If a guest's ram_size exceeds KVM_32BIT_GAP_START, the corresponding kvm tool's
virtual address size should be (ram_size + KVM_32BIT_GAP_SIZE), rather than
ram_size.
You're right.
There
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 15:02 +0800, Zang Hongyong wrote:
于 2011/12/16,星期五 13:50, Sasha Levin 写道:
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 09:01 +0800, zanghongy...@huawei.com wrote:
If a guest's ram_size exceeds KVM_32BIT_GAP_START, the corresponding kvm
tool's
virtual address size should be (ram_size +
