On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:45:03AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 08:45:44AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
With current code the number of threads added to the thread_pool
equals number of online CPUs. Thus on an OcteonIII cn78xx system we
usually have 48 threads per
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 08:45:44AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
With current code the number of threads added to the thread_pool
equals number of online CPUs. Thus on an OcteonIII cn78xx system we
usually have 48 threads per guest just for the thread_pool. IMHO this
is overkill for guests
With current code the number of threads added to the thread_pool
equals number of online CPUs. Thus on an OcteonIII cn78xx system we
usually have 48 threads per guest just for the thread_pool. IMHO this
is overkill for guests that just have a few vCPUs and/or if a guest is
pinned to a subset of
With current code the number of threads added to the thread_pool
equals number of online CPUs. IMHO on systems with many CPUs this is
overkill for guests that just have a few vCPUs and/or if a guest is
pinned to a subset of host CPUs. E.g. of a system with 48 cores
# numactl -C 4,5,7,8 ./lkvm
