On 07/21/2011 04:17 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-07-21 14:58, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/21/2011 03:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
The problem is that update can change lots of things. offset, size,
whether it's mmio or RAM, read-onlyness, even the wierd things like
coalesced mmio. So it's
On 2011-07-21 15:50, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/21/2011 04:17 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-07-21 14:58, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/21/2011 03:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
The problem is that update can change lots of things. offset, size,
whether it's mmio or RAM, read-onlyness, even the wierd
On 07/21/2011 05:32 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-07-21 15:50, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/21/2011 04:17 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-07-21 14:58, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/21/2011 03:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
The problem is that update can change lots of things. offset, size,
whether
On 2011-07-21 16:39, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/21/2011 05:32 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-07-21 15:50, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/21/2011 04:17 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-07-21 14:58, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/21/2011 03:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
The problem is that update can change
On 07/21/2011 06:05 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
The point is _update() can only make changes for one region atomic,
while _commit() is more general. You can sometimes batch all changes
into a single container region, but sometimes it is clumsy, and
sometimes impossible.
Deletion and
