On 08/20/2014 08:01 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> By the way, at present, I use Qemu as user mode program, is there common
> test with both Qemu and KVM/Xen? And is a PC enough for the common test?
>
Oh, I find Qemu have "make check" just like gcc/binutils, so for each of
my patch, next, shall run "./
By the way, at present, I use Qemu as user mode program, is there common
test with both Qemu and KVM/Xen? And is a PC enough for the common test?
Thanks.
On 08/20/2014 07:58 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 08/19/2014 11:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 19/08/2014 17:44, Chen Gang ha scritto:
Hel
On 08/19/2014 11:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 19/08/2014 17:44, Chen Gang ha scritto:
>> > Hello maintainers:
>> >
>> > Please help check this patch, when you have time.
> Hi, it's already on its way to 3.17-rc2, but I first have to run a bunch
> of tests.
OK, thanks. Also can let me try the
Il 19/08/2014 17:44, Chen Gang ha scritto:
> Hello maintainers:
>
> Please help check this patch, when you have time.
Hi, it's already on its way to 3.17-rc2, but I first have to run a bunch
of tests.
Paolo
> Thanks.
>
> On 08/08/2014 11:37 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> As a generic function, deassi
Hello maintainers:
Please help check this patch, when you have time.
Thanks.
On 08/08/2014 11:37 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> As a generic function, deassign_guest_irq() assumes it can be called
> even if assign_guest_irq() is not be called successfully (which can be
> triggered by ioctl from user mod
As a generic function, deassign_guest_irq() assumes it can be called
even if assign_guest_irq() is not be called successfully (which can be
triggered by ioctl from user mode, indirectly).
So for assign_guest_irq() failure process, need set 'dev->irq_source_id'
to -1 after free 'dev->irq_source_id'
