On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 08:44:50PM +0100, Stephan Bärwolf wrote:
Thank you for applying this, Marcelo.
I fear we (or me after I agreed) did some mistake by erasing the additional
cpuid 0x8001 checks.
In contradiction to only AMD it MUST also apply on Intel-CPUs.
Documentation
Okay, thx to hear a second opinion.
Then everything is ok, have a nice day.
regards Stephan
On 01/16/12 10:58, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 08:44:50PM +0100, Stephan Bärwolf wrote:
Thank you for applying this, Marcelo.
I fear we (or me after I agreed) did some mistake by
Thank you for applying this, Marcelo.
I fear we (or me after I agreed) did some mistake by erasing the additional
cpuid 0x8001 checks.
In contradiction to only AMD it MUST also apply on Intel-CPUs.
Documentation
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 04:56:33PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Stephan Baerwolf (2):
KVM: extend struct x86_emulate_ops with get_cpuid
KVM: fix missing illegal instruction-trap in protected modes
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 19
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
From d62ca9897e9970d777aec1d399318b0df44489bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Baerwolf stephan.baerw...@tu-ilmenau.de
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:32:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] KVM guest-kernel panics double fault
regarding: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/28/170
On tested computers (Intel
On 2012-01-12 16:43, Stephan Bärwolf wrote:
From d62ca9897e9970d777aec1d399318b0df44489bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Baerwolf stephan.baerw...@tu-ilmenau.de
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:32:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] KVM guest-kernel panics double fault
regarding: https
From 2168285ffb30716f30e129c3ce98ce42d19c4d4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Baerwolf stephan.baerw...@tu-ilmenau.de
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:13:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] KVM guest-kernel panics double fault
regarding: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/28/170
On tested computers (Intel
